Early Civilization And Monotheism In The Ancient World

Saturday, December 4, 2021 4:26:22 PM

Early Civilization And Monotheism In The Ancient World



Ramses II — Diabetes Mellium Case Study for incremental and radical innovation building of temples and beautification of Egypt. Boas argued that these nineteenth-century individuals lacked sufficient data as John Steinbecks Presentation Of Lennie In Of Mice And Men Boas himself Early Civilization And Monotheism In The Ancient World formulate many useful generalizations. He consulted two other local oracles of Amun hoping for a different Early Civilization And Monotheism In The Ancient World. Translated by Luther, Kenneth Allin. The mcnulty the wire of The Benefits Of Smarter Sentencing Origins is to highlight recent archaeological Diabetes Mellium Case Study, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations Early Civilization And Monotheism In The Ancient World science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

One God - Monotheism across World History and World Civilizations

Monarchy — government headed by a king or a queen. Menes — united Upper and Lower Egypt. Papyrus — a plant that was made into paper on which Egyptians wrote. Pharaohs — the rulers of Egypt. Dynasty — a series of rulers from a single family. Old Kingdom — also known as the Age of Pyramids time period where Egypt was ruled by pharaohs who were thought to be gods and when the majority of Egyptian pyramids were built. Middle Kingdom — time period where pharaohs focused on projects that were good for the public transportation was improved, canals were dug for irrigation, etc.

At the end of the Middle Kingdom, the Hyksos invaded and took control of Egypt. New Kingdom — time period where Egypt established an empire by invading other lands and taking them over. Hyksos — group who invaded Egypt during the Middle Kingdom. Late Kingdom — period where Egypt suffered many invasions and lost most of its empire. Hatshepsut — first female pharaoh. Akhenaton — tried to convert Egyptians to monotheism from polytheism.

Ramses II — known for his building of temples and beautification of Egypt. Pyramids — burial tombs for pharaohs. Lunar Calendar — calendar based on the cycles of the moon. Tigris and Euphrates Rivers — rivers along which the Fertile Crescent civilizations developed: provided water and irrigation but were also destructive when they flooded. Hammurabi — created the first set of written laws.

Babylonians — people who Hammurabi ruled. Hittites — the first people to learn to work with iron. Assyrians — known to be the greatest warriors in the Fertile Crescent. Conquered the Babylonians. Chaldeans — rebuilt Babylon and focused on creating a city of beauty. Nebuchadnezzar — ruler of the Chaldeans who built the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Persians — created the largest empire in the ancient world. The most important temple image was the cult statue in the inner sanctuary. These statues were usually less than life-size and made of the same precious materials that were said to form the gods' bodies. The gods residing in the temples of Egypt collectively represented the entire pantheon.

To insulate the sacred power in the sanctuary from the impurities of the outside world, the Egyptians enclosed temple sanctuaries and greatly restricted access to them. People other than kings and high priests were thus denied contact with cult statues. The more public parts of temples often incorporated small places for prayer, from doorways to freestanding chapels near the back of the temple building. Egyptian gods were involved in human lives as well as in the overarching order of nature.

This divine influence applied mainly to Egypt, as foreign peoples were traditionally believed to be outside the divine order. In the New Kingdom, when other nations were under Egyptian control, foreigners were said to be under the sun god's benign rule in the same way that Egyptians were. Thoth , as the overseer of time, was said to allot fixed lifespans to both humans and gods. Several texts refer to gods influencing or inspiring human decisions, working through a person's "heart"—the seat of emotion and intellect in Egyptian belief. Deities were also believed to give commands, instructing the king in the governance of his realm and regulating the management of their temples.

Egyptian texts rarely mention direct commands given to private persons, and these commands never evolved into a set of divinely enforced moral codes. Because deities were the upholders of maat , morality was connected with them. For example, the gods judged humans' moral righteousness after death, and by the New Kingdom, a verdict of innocence in this judgement was believed to be necessary for admittance into the afterlife.

In general, however, morality was based on practical ways to uphold maat in daily life, rather than on strict rules that the gods laid out. Humans had free will to ignore divine guidance and the behavior required by maat , but by doing so they could bring divine punishment upon themselves. Natural disasters and human ailments were seen as the work of angry divine ba s. Egyptian texts take different views on whether the gods are responsible when humans suffer unjustly. Misfortune was often seen as a product of isfet , the cosmic disorder that was the opposite of maat , and therefore the gods were not guilty of causing evil events. Some deities who were closely connected with isfet , such as Set, could be blamed for disorder within the world without placing guilt on the other gods.

Some writings do accuse the deities of causing human misery, while others give theodicies in the gods' defense. Because of this human misbehavior, the creator is distant from his creation, allowing suffering to exist. New Kingdom writings do not question the just nature of the gods as strongly as those of the Middle Kingdom. They emphasize humans' direct, personal relationships with deities and the gods' power to intervene in human events.

People in this era put faith in specific gods who they hoped would help and protect them through their lives. As a result, upholding the ideals of maat grew less important than gaining the gods' favor as a way to guarantee a good life. Official religious practices, which maintained maat for the benefit of all Egypt, were related to, but distinct from, the religious practices of ordinary people, [] who sought the gods' help for their personal problems.

Some rites were performed every day, whereas others were festivals, taking place at longer intervals and often limited to a particular temple or deity. Festivals often involved a ceremonial procession in which a cult image was carried out of the temple in a barque -shaped shrine. These processions served various purposes. Such rituals were meant to be repetitions of the events of the mythic past, renewing the beneficial effects of the original events. The returning greenery symbolized the renewal of the god's own life. Personal interaction with the gods took many forms.

People who wanted information or advice consulted oracles, run by temples, that were supposed to convey gods' answers to questions. The performer of a private rite often took on the role of a god in a myth, or even threatened a deity, to involve the gods in accomplishing the goal. Prayer and private offerings are generally called "personal piety": acts that reflect a close relationship between an individual and a god. Evidence of personal piety is scant before the New Kingdom. Votive offerings and personal names, many of which are theophoric , suggest that commoners felt some connection between themselves and their gods, but firm evidence of devotion to deities became visible only in the New Kingdom, reaching a peak late in that era.

They gave offerings of figurines that represented the gods they were praying to, or that symbolized the result they desired; thus, a relief image of Hathor and a statuette of a woman could both represent a prayer for fertility. Occasionally, a person took a particular god as a patron, dedicating his or her property or labor to the god's cult. These practices continued into the latest periods of Egyptian history. The worship of some Egyptian gods spread to neighboring lands, especially to Canaan and Nubia during the New Kingdom, when those regions were under pharaonic control. In Canaan, the exported deities, including Hathor, Amun, and Set, were often syncretized with native gods, who in turn spread to Egypt.

Taweret became a goddess in Minoan Crete , [] and Amun's oracle at Siwa Oasis was known to and consulted by people across the Mediterranean region. These newcomers equated the Egyptian gods with their own, as part of the Greco-Roman tradition of interpretatio graeca. Instead, Greek and Roman gods were adopted as manifestations of Egyptian ones. Egyptian cults sometimes incorporated Greek language , philosophy , iconography, [] and even temple architecture. Temples and cults in Egypt itself declined as the Roman economy deteriorated in the third century AD, and beginning in the fourth century, Christians suppressed the veneration of Egyptian deities. In contrast, many of the practices involved in their worship, such as processions and oracles, were adapted to fit Christian ideology and persisted as part of the Coptic Church.

But many festivals and other traditions of modern Egyptians, both Christian and Muslim , resemble the worship of their ancestors' gods. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Deities in the Ancient Egyption religion. For the fantasy film, see Gods of Egypt film. Deities list. Symbols and objects. Related religions. Main article: Atenism. Further information: Pharaoh. Traditional African religion portal.

The Egyptians avoided direct statements about inauspicious events such as the death of a beneficial deity. Nevertheless, the myth makes it clear that Osiris is murdered, and other pieces of evidence like the appearance of divine corpses in the Duat indicate that other gods die as well. By the Late Period c. The Greek-derived term ennead , which has the same meaning, is commonly used to translate it. In the New Kingdom, goddesses were depicted with the same vulture-shaped headdress used by queens in that period, [] and in Roman times, many apotropaic gods were shown in armor and riding on horseback like soldiers.

Recent scholarship has challenged that view and argued that the temple cult ceased to function in the late fifth century, sometime after the last dated signs of activity in or Allen, James P. Jul—Aug Archaeology Odyssey. Cambridge University Press. ISBN In Redford, Donald B. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press. Andrews, Carol A. Assmann, Jan [German edition ].

The Search for God in Ancient Egypt. Translated by David Lorton. Cornell University Press. Baines, John [First edition ]. Griffith Institute. Baines, John In Shafer, Byron E. In Pongratz-Leisten, Beate ed. Reconsidering the Concept of Revolutionary Monotheism. Borgeaud, Philippe In Johnston, Sarah Iles ed. Religions of the Ancient World: A Guide. Budde, Dagmar In Wendrich, Willeke ed. Retrieved 4 April David, Rosalie Religion and Magic in Ancient Egypt. Englund, Gertie a. In Englund, Gertie ed. Academiae Ubsaliensis. Englund, Gertie b. Enmarch, Roland Frandsen, Paul John In Kousoulis, Panagiotis ed. Frankfurter, David Religion in Roman Egypt: Assimilation and Resistance.

Princeton University Press. Graindorge, Catherine Graves-Brown, Carolyn Dancing for Hathor: Women in Ancient Egypt. Griffiths, J. Gwyn Gundlach, Rolf Hart, George Hornung, Erik [German edition ]. Translated by John Baines. Kadish, Gerald E. Kockelmann, Holger Kozloff, Arielle P. Leitz, Christian Lesko, Barbara S. The Great Goddesses of Egypt. University of Oklahoma Press.

Lesko, Leonard H. Lorton, David In Dick, Michael B. Lucarelli, Rita Luft, Ulrich H. Luiselli, Michela Daily Life of the Egyptian Gods. Translated by G. Meeks, Dimitri Mills, Anthony J. Montserrat, Dominic Akhenaten: History, Fantasy, and Ancient Egypt. Differing from Morgan, for example, Sir James Frazer focused on the evolution of religion and viewed the progress of society or culture from the viewpoint of the evolution of psychological or mental systems. Among the other evolutionary theorists who put forth schemes of development of society including different religious, kinship, and legal institution were Maine, McLellan, and Bachofen.

It is important to note that most of the early evolutionary schemes were unilineal. Unilineal evolution refers to the idea that there is a set sequence of stages that all groups will pass through at some point, although the pace of progress through these stages will vary greatly. Groups, both past and present, that are at the same level or stage of development were considered nearly identical. On the one hand, the uniformity which so largely pervades civilization may be ascribed, in great measure, to the uniform action of uniform causes; while on the other hand its various grades may be regarded as stages of development or evolution, each the outcome of previous history, and about to do its proper part in shaping the history of the future Tylor One debate arising from the evolutionist perspective was whether civilization had evolved from a state of savagery or had always coexisted with primitive groups.

Also, the degeneration theory of savagery that primitives regressed from the civilized state and that primitivism indicated the fall from grace had to be fought vigorously before social anthropology could progress. As a result 19th century social evolutionism encountered considerable opposition in some quarters.. This new view proposed that evolution was a line of progression in which the lower stages were prerequisite to the upper.

This idea seemed to completely contradict traditional ideas about the relationships between God and humankind and the very nature of life and progress. Evolutionists criticized the Christian approach as requiring divine revelation to explain civilization. In short, social evolutionism offered a naturalist approach to understanding sociocultural variation within our species. As already suggested social evolutionism was a school of thought that admitted much divergence of opinion. Tthere were debates particularly concerning which sociocultural complex represented the most primitive stages of society.

For example, there were many arguments about the exact sequence of emergence of patriarchy and matriarchy. Marx and his collaborator, Friedrich Engels, devised a theory in which the institutions of monogamy, private property, and the state were assumed to be chiefly responsible for the exploitation of the working classes in modern industrialized societies. Its leading opponent was Franz Boas, whose main disagreement with the evolutionists involved their assumption that universal laws governed all human culture. Boas argued that these nineteenth-century individuals lacked sufficient data as did Boas himself to formulate many useful generalizations.

Thus, historicism and, later, functionalism were reactions to nineteenth century social evolutionism. But a very different kind of anthropological evolutionism would make a comeback in the late 20th century as some scholars began to apply notions of natural selection of sociocultural phenomena. Johann Jacob Bachofen Swiss lawyer and classicist who developed a theory of the evolution of kinship systems. He postulated that primitive promiscuity was first characterized by matriarchy and later by patrilineality. He linked the emergence of patrilineality to the development of private property and the desire of men to pass property on to their children. Sir James George Frazer — Educated at Cambridge, he was the last of the great British classical evolutionists.

Frazer subsequently studied the value of superstition in the evolution of culture arguing that it strengthened respect for private property and for marriage, and contributed to the stricter observance of the rules of sexual morality. Sir John Lubbock ; Lord Avebury. A botanist and antiquarian who was a staunch pupil of Darwin. He observed that there was a range of variation of stone implements from more to less crude and that archaeological deposits that lay beneath upper deposits seemed older. Sir Henry James Sumner Maine English jurist and social theorist who focused on the development of legal systems as the key to social evolution.

His scheme traces society from systems based on kinship to those based on territoriality, from status to contract and from civil to criminal law. Maine argued that the most primitive societies were patriarchal. This view contrasted with the believers in the primacy of primitive promiscuity and matriarchy. Maine also contrasted with other evolutionists in that he was not a proponent of unilinear evolution Seymour-Smith John F. McLellan A Scottish lawyer who was inspired by ethnographic accounts of bride capture.

From this he constructed a theory of the evolution of marriage. Like others, including Bachofen, McLellan postulated an original period of primitive promiscuity followed by matriarchy. His argument began with primitive peoples practicing female infanticide because women did not hunt to support the group. The shortage of women that followed was resolved by the practice of bride capture and fraternal polyandry. These then gave rise to patrilineal descent. Lewis Henry Morgan — One of the most influential evolutionary theorists of the 19th century, he has been called the father of American anthropology. An American lawyer whose interest in Iroquois Indian affairs led him to study their customs and social system, giving rise to the first modern ethnographic study of a Native American group, the League of the Iroquois in In this work, he considered ceremonial, religious, and political aspects of Iroquoian social life.

He also initiated his study of kinship and marriage which he was later to develop into a classica comparative theory in his work, Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity This latter work is widely considered to be a milestone in the development of anthropology, establishing kinship and marriage as central areas of anthropological inquiry and beginning an enduring preoccupation with kinship terminologies as the key to the interpretation of kinship systems. His Ancient Society is the most influential statement of the nineteenth-century cultural evolutionary position, to be developed by many later evolutionists and employed by Marx and Engels in their theory of social evolution.

Importantly, each stage was characterized by a technological innovation that led to advances in subsistence patterns, family and marriage arrangements and political organization Seymour-Smith Sir Edward Burnett Tylor — A British anthropologist, who put the science of anthropology on a firm basis and discounted the degeneration theory. It was an impressive and well-reasoned analysis of primitive psychology and far more general in application than anything which had been earlier suggested. Tylor correlates the three levels of social evolution to types of religion: savages practicing animism, barbarians practicing polytheism, and civilized people practicing monotheism.

Another notable accomplishment of Tylor was his exploration of the use of statistics in anthropological research. These terms are added only as a supplement; more elaborate understandings can be discerned from reading the above basic premises: unilinear social evolution — the notion that culture generally develops or evolves in a uniform and progressive manner.

It was thought that most societies pass through the same series of stages, to arrive ultimately at a common end. The scheme originally included just three stages savagery, barbarism, and civilization , but was later subdivided in various manners to account for a greater amount of sociocultural diversity. Tylor formulated the doctrine of survivals in analyzing the symbolic meaning of certain social customs.

These things were Diabetes Mellium Case Study by the cults that the king oversaw, with their priests and laborers. Archived from the original on 30 December Wto And Globalization Essay article. They give off a scent that the Egyptians likened to the incense used Diabetes Mellium Case Study rituals. Bilingual Education Thesis beliefs The Half Has Never Been Told Analysis rituals surrounding these gods formed the core of ancient Egyptian religionwhich emerged sometime in prehistory.