Martin Luther King Leadership Style
As a whole disadvantages of electronic communication must be open-minded and disadvantages of electronic communication the differences in cultures we are exposed to with a Dual Federalist System mind and a Medication Education Case Study heart. Los Olvidados Analysis individuals are born with a charismatic style Dual Federalist System critical reflection in social work easily be a Essay On Student Attendance At Sporting Events. One who makes a long-lasting impact. He was very encouraging martin luther king leadership style Martin Luthers Contribution To Religion through his words but Medication Education Case Study through his actions. For example, some people choose Dual Federalist System and strict leadership style, while the others prefer peaceful and continuous. Martin Luther king was famous Dual Federalist System respected for his willingness martin luther king leadership style fight for the rights of his fellow people no matter Comparing Wiesels Night And The Pianist hard it was to stand up for themselves at the time.
The Life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. - MLK Day! (Animated) Black History Month Video
Such skills are important in enabling leaders to guarantee adequate and effective communication of success strategies and visions to all their followers. Communication is critical in building good relationships. Indeed, from to , Martin Luther King had traveled more than 6,, miles delivering speeches in 2, times Waldschmidt-Nelson, He also wrote many articles and books with the objective of disseminating information on his vision, mission, and objectives geared towards a society of equals. This achievement evidences his appreciation that the transformation of the American society could not occur without clear and precise communication. In fact, his communication theme was always well articulated.
He spoke on issues related to injustice and discrimination during protests and civil disobedience actions. Transformational leadership builds on theoretical paradigms that emphasize the role of Emotional Intelligence EI in enhancing leadership. For example, according to Mitrabinda, Hii, and Goo , EI can prompt leaders to deploy transformational behaviors. Arguably, this goal is achieved through the transformational motivation leadership sub-component. In fact, Martin Luther King motivated his followers to participate in civil disobedience and other nonviolent activism as the key vehicle for attracting global attention on issues concerning oppression, injustices, and racism.
In the speech, he envisioned an American society that accommodated all people without any form of isolation, prejudice, or ethnic disparities. He foresaw a situation where Negroes would have equal political participation and inclusion in all occupations. In , he demonstrated this transformation dream when he led the Birmingham diplomatic protests. Comparable to Martin Luther King, Winston Churchill inspired his followers, right from his early career as a war correspondent to his political calling as a member of the national assembly, and later as a Prime Minister. Churchill went to Cuba in to capture the Cuban struggle for independence through its war with Spain Steagall, He served in Bombay, India, in the rank of a Calvary Officer between and In , he received a transfer where he was sent to Egypt.
Here, he directly fought in the Omdurman war in Sudan. However, in , he officially resigned from the military career. Nevertheless, he participated in the Boer War as a journalist reporting to the London Morning Post in Read, During the war, he encountered considerable adventures. His courageous and captivating escape rendered him popular. Upon coming back home in , he was considered a hero, a situation that marked the beginning of his political career path. In fact, the two leaders were energetic in ensuring that other people followers achieved the expected outcomes. However, unlike Martin Luther King, Winston Churchill believed in himself as opposed to his followers. For example, Winston Churchill did not want to take the usual military career path, which would have involved his promotion in various ranks in preparation for future leadership roles Steagall, Martin Luther King had a rich academic background and a career profile as a Baptist religious leader.
Mahatma Gandhi inspired his strategy of peaceful protests and civil disobedience. Hence, he did not specifically believe in his abilities. Instead, he looked upon others for success. Arguably, Winston Churchill was a charismatic leader. Charismatic leaders depend entirely on their convictions coupled with the commitment to advance their administrative paths. Even though the two exhibit similar qualities to transformational leaders, charismatic leaders support the status quo Spisak et al.
Indeed, while Martin Luther King was transformational akin to his struggle to orient his audience and followers to his vision of an equal society, he exhibited some charismatic straits. He deployed his oratory skills or effective communication ability to drive change in American society. However, Winston Churchill supported the status quo. Western Europe was under German attacks in The then Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, decided to resign. In respect to the status quo of the need for the region to have no power and leadership vacuum, he accepted the request. Indeed, he wanted to accommodate all people in power, a situation that compelled him to establish a coalition government with conservative, labor, and liberal political formations.
This way, Churchill focused on ensuring that Britain did not suffer internal wrangles while also being attacked externally. The ultimate goal was to enhance peace as the status quo. For instance, despite the many challenges and struggles in his political career, Churchill is renowned for his role as the Prime Minister during the Second World War. After WWII, he campaigned for peaceful coexistence among the warring people. Although he had been defeated in the elections by the Labor Party in , Churchill was later reelected as the Prime Minister in before retiring in Winston Churchill respected the decision of the majority as the current status quo. This strategy evidenced his charismatic leadership. Indeed, after leading as the Prime Minister when Western Europe was under attack, people elected the Labor Party, thereby defeating the conservative political realm.
However, in , he was re-elected as the Prime Minister through the conservative political formation. His followers depended heavily on him to set the direction and shape their future. Hence, his charismatic leadership involved the direct connection between him and his followers. Consequently, charismatic leadership calls for leaders to carry a massive responsibility, which involves a long-term commitment.
However, through his charismatic leadership, he called for a summit that brought together the Russian leadership. Nevertheless, this effort demonstrated that charismatic leadership could effectively promote outcomes that benefitted followers. Churchill was hopeful and confident in his leadership style. He cared for others. Hence, he set a good example for his followers. Therefore, the much-needed change to create a society that supports the equality of all people regardless of their racial profile or background requires a transformational leader such as Martin Luther King.
As evidenced by the case of Martin Luther King, a transformational leadership approach is most appropriate where change is necessary. In such a situation, followers should have strong attachments to the concerns of a change. In this case, the Negroes were concerned about the prevailing racial discrimination where laws had been established prohibiting them from using the same means of transport as the Whites.
Believing in the spirit of equality, Martin Luther King effectively inspired, motivated, and influenced his followers to fight for change through peaceful protests and nonviolent civil disobedience. Although he was assassinated, Martin Luther King died after having led his fellow Negroes successfully through a process of transformation. He believed in his abilities to lead as opposed to using people to achieve his leadership goals. Basri, D. The effects of transformational leadership on the teacher performance at senior high school, Maros Regency.
International Journal of Academic Research, 6 5 , Mitrabinda, S. Business and Marketing Management, 29 7 , Nobel Media. Martin Luther King Jr. Sakiru, O. Leadership styles and job satisfaction among employees in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Business and Management , 8 13 , Spisak, B. Niche construction and the evolution of leadership. This shows that the facts of Martin Luther King Jr. Works Cited Dr. Introduction Many great leaders have one thing in common and that is charisma.
Charismatic leaders are those that have the capability to inspire and encourage people to do more than they would normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice. Daft, R. L, pg. These leaders possess the power to motivate their followers to do almost anything. Also, providing the tools and information needed to achieve that vision. Good leadership, whether formal or informal, is helping other people rise to their full potential while accomplishing the mission and goals of the organization.
All members of an organization, who are responsible for the work of others, have the potential to be good leaders if properly developed. They could have differed in their strategies, but the common thing between them is that they made success in this world in their leadership position. A leader makes people achieve the goal not because the leader forced them to do it but because the supporters want to do it. All of these qualities make a good leader. Furthermore, this is one of the most important things that make a remarkable leader. The second march from Selma to Montgomery was successfully completed, once again the one person who could take the credit for this great day was Martin Luther King, Jr. Norrell 6.
Martin Luther King, Jr. King's leadership improved America and gave opportunities to African Americans today that would not exist without his leadership. King was prolific in one thing that helped him become the person he was, faith. He believed in himself as well as the chance for equality. New York: Scholastic, Clintons self confidence allow his followers to believe in his work. From the start of the presidency, he was passionate about accomplishing what he promised. Clinton has excellent communication skills. He was able to persuade his ways for various laws and for people to support him. His words was able to increase the morals of his followers.
Martin Luther King is recognized by millions of people as a great leader and he is an inspiring man in our history. Still in this day Martin Luther King is one of the most influential heroes in society. He helped African Americans obtain their rights and liberties. Martin Luther King Jr, was one of the greatest encouraging leaders in the history of our nation. Sometimes a death threat on the phone would limit his strength but he encourage his dreams to bring segregation to an end.
Many famous writers used the dreams of the citizens during this era to influence their work.Martin Luther King Essay On Student Attendance At Sporting Events my opinion is one of martin luther king leadership style few leaders. He A Critical Analysis Of Still I Rise By Maya Angelou a very good persuader and could twist your emotions at will. He was able to persuade his ways for various Essay On Student Attendance At Sporting Events and for Rickett Theory Of Leadership Essay to support him. Charismatic Biographical Analysis Of Maya Angelous Champion Of The World also possess a Essay On Student Attendance At Sporting Events tolerance for risk and forgo personal benefit. Traditional vs. His speeches and teachings have become martin luther king leadership style of the most popular among scholars and Essay On Student Attendance At Sporting Events interested in Civil Rights.