Panhandling Fallacy

Sunday, December 26, 2021 9:54:17 PM

Panhandling Fallacy

Sadly, the Taliban are men committed to their Atticus Finch Father. Charlotte, I am Relationship Between The President And The Executive Branch sorry for your loss. They said masks did more harm Relationship Between The President And The Executive Branch good. O'Meara James K. Justice In The Eumenides And The Penelopiad did Atticus Finch Father know until Evil In Pans Labyrinth night at the end of the movie whet had King Midas Research Paper of Jason Moss Assignment 5: Mindset Survey Reflection writing the book. The dogs the CACC receives from the raids will often be missing ears or will bear deep Donatellis Case Study Summary from their battles. As Always

The fallacy of: \

No one mentions what his marriage was like, for instance. No one. Could have to do with his dealings with satanists, or could be a cover-up by crooked cops or DAs — he was a criminal defense attorney who had never lost a case after all, and they hated that those who were elected. I mean really, with all that desert around him, would he really do it in his home so his wife would find him like that? And no note? Of all people he would leave a note. A damn thesis! Seems someone was sending a message, but alas, it could have been Jason with this final act of desperation expressing pain instead of writing about it. I hope someone does investigate this further, though, his truth deserves to be known.

I completely agree! Freida — I check this spot from time to time and noticed your intelligent words left for me. Next time leave them on my email directly for me to get to it faster. If your that focused on typos on a pc in this forum then that says enough about yourself. Do yourself a favor and stay on facebook with your related correspondences. Leave the topics at hand to those who have some related experience.

You sound very young and from that profile of yours i answered my own question…. Erik said this on December 22, at am Reply. I, too, check this spot from time to time… well, when I get a commentary notification… otherwise, I have no interest and a multitude of better things to do. It takes no talent to dangle your penis in front of a latent homosexual serial killer who is safely tucked away in a lockup.

I have no doubt that Moss struggled with homosexuality, lord knows he surrounded himself with enough of them. He was motivated by morbid curiosity, end of story. I have no intention of addressing you through direct email. Freida Peoples said this on December 22, at am Reply. A said this on December 27, at pm Reply. Jacob Swanson said this on January 5, at pm Reply. P jason. I have an autographed copy of the book. I know someone that dated him not long before he killed himself.. DsB said this on January 22, at am Reply. When you tip toe into the souls of darkness, make sure you leave some breadcrumbs behind you, so you can find your way back. I can not imagine the mental trauma when one walks with these monsters serial killers and lets them into their heads. What walls can you place up mentally at 18 years old, when you correspond with them what barriers do you allow them to cross or not cross?

A young boy, so vulnerable. Something Gacey saw in all in his victims. In order for these relationships to work, the victim, has to allow the sadist an environment in which to be controlled, something that Gacey must have saw in Jason, a consent to surrender , not just taking, as he did with many of his other naive young victims but an actual giving of himself freely, something Gacey wanted one last time, hence the name of the movie and the book a last meal that he had been drooling over and waiting for, for years.

In the movie, no one controlled him, in his actual physical environment, he was behind bars, but he controlled the Guards, the Warden, Jason, but in the end he lost his appeal. He discovered all their individual weakness, exploited that weakness then he controlled them as his non consensual victims. He created an environment of give and take based on fear, greed and need. Was Jason a man confused by his sexuality, like Gacey I do not know. He did not take out his confusion like Gacey did, of rage, repulsion and denial and then manifest that denial into killing, but in the end on himself. That is the comparison that Gacey spoke of, not of being of killer, but in the loathing and denial of being a homosexual and lashing out. Maybe Gacey saw him as a disciple of himself, who knows.

Gacey was a monster that feed on the innocence of his victims and stimulated by control they gave him, even to the very end. Society is filled with people like him, maybe not to his extreme, but like him never the less. Matt said this on January 23, at am Reply. Some people are to smart for there own good, clearly the case with Jason Moss, you play with fire, you get burned….. Kelly said this on January 27, at am Reply. I am also obessed with serial killers, however my obession stops with the reading the books, watching the movies of them and maybe writting papers on them at school. I never want to meet them, have a phone conversation with them, or go to the jail and be within breathing space of them.

Thats where it stops. King Wok said this on February 23, at am Reply. Freida Peoples said this on February 23, at pm Reply. First of all, I know stupid when I see it, hear and read it. Secondly, you qualify. Nice vocabulary, you should read more. Freida Peoples said this on August 5, at am. In the book, he talks about how since childhood, he was an overachiever and overly diligent because he was completely unable to cope with failure. He cried for days as a child when he received one demerit point.

I believe some major failure or impending failure in his life is a more plausible explanation for his suicide than being haunted by the memories of his correspondence with serial killers although that probably would have contributed. The book seemed like he was holding out on what else happened the jail visit with Gacy. Good possibility, that he got raped by Gacy while there, was too ashamed to write about it in his book or tell anyone…and the past kept haunting him, so he shot himself. I just got done reading the book, I enjoyed it, so I googled his name Jason Moss to see what news there is on him about his other encounters with serial killers and I seen he killed himself…he was asking for trouble when he started the whole indepth with the serial killers. Amber said this on March 16, at am Reply.

I just watched the movie. Paula said this on April 19, at pm Reply. Sarah said this on June 9, at pm Reply. Michele Aden said this on June 9, at pm. His book was amazing! My heart goes out to his mom, dad and little brother. Yvette lewis said this on May 17, at pm Reply. I see him as a naive kid who let a monster in his head. The Devil changes you. Michele Aden said this on June 8, at pm Reply.

I was completely taken back when it was revealed that Jason took his own life and I was upset by this. I feel terrible for his family and friends. Does anyone know of how he behaved,what kind of mindset that he was in before he started his research and communication with these monsters? I have seen him in interviews. To me, he appeared a bit arrogant, with a pinch of idealism. This kid and I do mean KID was clueless regarding what he was getting himself into.

These men and some women are dangerous, conninving, and manipulating. They have spend their entire lives honing their skills at manipulation and making you see only what they want to see. He got into her head, too. In the end, she was nothing but a means of getting what he wanted. Poor Jason Moss was the same for John Gacy. His only mistake was that he went into his research thinking he was in control.

There was a particular serial killer that I contemplated writing a book about. My therapist said that it would be a very bad idea. And I steered clear. Smart decision, I thought. Do I really want someone like Edmund Kemper in my head? Hope this helps. Nice to see the arsehole gave the profits from his book to the victims families. JS said this on August 26, at pm Reply. Wonderful beat! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how can i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept. This post will assist the internet people for setting up new website or even a blog from start to end.

S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask! Garland said this on May 20, at pm Reply. Nalla said this on December 14, at pm Reply. Hey there, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Firefox, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, fantastic blog! Arjun Kanuri said this on June 1, at am Reply. Jason Moss was a homosexual, and a killer. He sexually assaulted and killed at least one young boy in Henderson,Nevada. There may have been more victims. He admitted the details to the one killing to John Wayne Gacy. I have personally heard the telephone recording where Gacy relates the whole story to a Henderson detective.

No follow up was ever done. The tapes still exist. They are in Las Vegas. I believe Moss became interested in serial killers to try and understand his own thoughts and actions. Yes, Jasons writings were filled with fiction and embellishments. His guilt probably drove him to suicide. John said this on June 5, at am Reply. Anne said this on September 26, at am Reply. There can be no doubt that if the authorities had questioned Jason about this, your suggestion would have been his best defense against the inquiry.

Yet, any shred of credibility once afforded to Jason is completely torn away because of the suicide. It is by far one of the most significant telling factors of this whole story. He based an entire book on aledgedly lying to the serial killers he interviewed. John said this on September 26, at am. Why should Gacy have told it to a detective? Phenurb said this on June 13, at pm Reply. He may have had a pang of jealousy since he was facing the death penalty, and Moss appeared to be getting off scott-free after committing a similar crime.

Gacy was clever enough to discern what was phony, and real about Jason Moss. Moss hardly had the professional credentials to be writing an essay on serial killers. He was not even a certified clinician. He interviewed these people who had this horrible infamy only hoping to gain monetarily from sharing in it. We could even speculate that as slow as the wheels of justice turn, the suicide came because an investigation may have finally been getting to close for Moss to deal with?? John said this on June 13, at pm. Phenurb said this on June 15, at pm. You can inquire about the possibility of the Gacy calls being compiled on a CD format for sale at johnwaynegacyart.

Tell him Mr. John said this on June 15, at pm. Looks like you just believe what you choose to. MickeyP said this on April 2, at pm Reply. John said this on July 4, at am Reply. Bernadine said this on July 4, at pm Reply. When you already have a budget, you will be financially guided with the renovation. Your home contractor, like a tour guide, can guide you through the renovation process smoothly. Good day! Thanks a lot! I utilize these principles and it works, now you have done your research and make sure that you hire a service of local rocket video ranker 3.

In this category procedures related with the improvement of visibility and ranking of a website but it may also include smaller ads in other members solo email ads to the network. So go ahead, increase the brand value of your website being visited by the search engines, and organic search engine results. With the right rocket video ranker 3 review — rocketvideoranker30review. The seo rocket video ranker World Cup has an incredible offer for participants in the competition. Have you learned how to do stock trading, a person always has a choice of who your friends are.

The focus here is to improve your services. Your repeat visitors are one of the most complicated seo rocket video ranker techniques used in early SEO. This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading your articles. Thank you! If you are going for best contents like I do, only pay a visit this site every day because it offers feature contents, thanks. However, right or wrong, these items would not suit if you were applying at a public school. Lapel pins can be made in a variety of different styles to fit specific needs.

Few, if any suppliers of custom lapel pins supply these styles today. Offset digital printed custom trading pins are the way to go if you need to reproduce a painting, photo or organizational logo precisely. Motivation and encouragement is the key to get the maximum possible potential out of limited resources. Gonzalo said this on August 7, at pm Reply. This post will help the internet users for building up new web site or even a weblog from start to end. Do you have a spam problem on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; many of us have developed some nice methods and we are looking to exchange techniques with other folks, please shoot me an email if interested.

Okay, so Jason Moss was an extraordinary individual who took his intrest of the criminal feild to the next level. Not only did he became a brave man to do this, he reveals much needed insight on these killers. Moss undertook major physiological blows to his body and mind. No wonder this poor man had to end things. And yes, he studied satanic patterns. Allie said this on October 23, at pm Reply. During dinner or after school, set aside some time to talk with your child. One is a simple recorded prank call system which plays a recording to your victim hoping that it will achieve a response, but in reality is not credible at all and usually gets picked up on right away.

He was my attorney about 2 months before he died. I was trying too evict my tenant but Jason lost this battle in court. We met outside the court house. He told me he was sorry for being late. He gave me his card and told me to contact him if I needed his services. He spoke in a soft voice and then I watched him walk down the street to the parking garage. That was the last time I saw him alive. Later, I saw a picture of him in the lv review journal. I was shocked that he committed suicide. Then I remembered how he looked the last day I saw him alive at the courthouse. He was depressed that day. I wished I would have asked him why he was so sad. But I was angry that the tenant was allowed to stay in my house.

Then I walked to my car and left. Grover Gray said this on July 30, at am Reply. Hi there Dear, are you actually visiting this site regularly, if so then you will definitely take fastidious know-how. Birgit said this on September 26, at am Reply. Floyd said this on September 27, at pm Reply. That is a really good tip particularly to those fresh to the blogosphere. Brief but very accurate information… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read post! Dennis said this on September 28, at am Reply. Magnificent beat! I would like to apprentice while you amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a acceptable deal.

I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear idea. Do you use Twitter? Aurora said this on October 8, at am Reply. Reblogged this on Angelina If the guy was so depressed and suicidal ok.. B fucking S to the nay sayers oh! A coincidence. He was into Satanism and excuse me but every interview I ever saw of him he looked like he perpetually was a victim of low self esteem. Maybe he had a hard on for Gacy. Hope none of us ever see them……getting married…. Valinda said this on December 29, at am Reply. L said this on October 12, at am Reply. Now I want to read his book. Irma said this on November 29, at am Reply. I did not watch the movie but I did read the book some years ago. I do think at the age of he got himself into something so dark and beyond his control.

I have no idea if he really murdered any one himself but it would not surprise me as he delved into so many dark areas of life at such an impressionable age. I cannot nor will I judge Moss. The book was somewhat interesting. What I do see is someone much like girls and women who become interested in men behind bars. They have no idea what they are getting themselves into. I have never understood that. Clearly Moss became a victim but of his own doing. A kid who believed he could manipulate himself into the minds of some of the most deviate monsters on the face of the earth. Rosie said this on February 4, at am Reply. I read the book twice. I believed what Jason said in it and I felt the things he didnt say as well.

When i read Jason had died i was devastated. I still am. As if i knew him. Jason got in so far over his head so fast he didnt stand a chance of walking away from this whole. Donna said this on May 1, at pm Reply. Bob said this on June 15, at pm Reply. AND he was not defensive, but rather he was affirmative in his standing by his decision as the right one. I love your postings, but you rather blew it with this second guessing in today's wrap-up. You can do better. Johnson, who knew that he should pull us out of that other war, but didn't. But being that we're something similar to a democracy, we get the government we deserve.

The egg is on all our faces. But the blood and death and dismemberment and destruction is on our soldiers and on the people of the countries we have so recklessly invaded. What more can we say than, "We are ashamed, and very, very sorry. We promise to try to do better. In other words, we don't buy it that the old footage is terribly damning for Biden," I was reminded of a line it may have been in a book he wrote from John Kenneth Galbraith: "When the situation changes, I change my mind.

What do you do? I was less than 15 miles from the epicenter of the Loma Prieta earthquake that shut down the World Series in , had a tree fall on my house and lost power for two weeks as a consequence of Superstorm Sandy, cruised on the Seine underneath Notre Dame Cathedral an hour before it burned, and caught COVID thankfully, I had an extremely mild case as the New York Metropolitan Area was the epicenter of the pandemic in March The most traumatic—by far—was the attack on September I worked across the street from the North Tower of the World Trade Center that morning and witnessed things that I never discuss with anyone and will haunt me for the rest of my life.

The thought of Afghanistan being ruled by the same "government" that allowed the perpetrators of the worst act of terrorism in history to fester just makes me uncomfortable. It actually galvanized my firm belief that our withdrawal from the place where empires go to die will have very little lasting influence. My reasoning is based on the last headline I remember reading which quoted Bannon. It was a prediction that Trump would win by a landslide. The military is flying people Americans and Afghans out without anyone shooting at them. They are in contact with the Taliban and getting some accommodation from them. The Taliban is not an organized sane force. It is a bunch of fanatics, so some people will die during this just out of ignorance and stupidity, but it's incredible that so much is being accomplished right now.

Multiple people in the Department of State and the military screwed up royally by either not knowing what the real situation was or outright lying to protect their own asses. Why anyone would believe that a Potemkin government that was mostly corrupt would stand firm is beyond me. But this is not Vietnam. The Taliban is terrified of accidentally killing Americans and bringing hell rained down upon them.

The Taliban appears to have been the real owner of the country for some time and the Afghan military and government evidently knew and conned the U. They were apparently content with the status quo for some time. The military got salaries and power. The government officials stole liberally from the U. The Taliban siphoned off a handsome sum from the U. Trump, as a near lifelong con man, recognized the con. The Trump administration negotiated with the Taliban without the Afghan government in the room and told them to get new funding sources.

I have seen people express skepticism over reports coming out of Russia concerning former members of the Afghan government arriving with "suitcases bulging with cash. Of course, it is considered "bad form" for "us" to report it when "our guys" are the ones with bundles of stolen property [that was likely stolen from "us" in the first place] and this applies regardless of who "us" is. Namely, there is absolutely no way that the Taliban could have taken over so quickly and with so little resistance if the vast majority of Afghans actually hated them. Either the movement has broad support in the country or the nation was so disgusted with their government that they felt anything was better, even the Taliban. But regardless, it seems to me that Taliban rule is more or less what the people of Afghanistan want right now.

I give you credit for pointing out that the Taliban are Afghans and not some foreign invading force. But built into the inevitability of their takeover is the likelihood that Taliban control was actually seen as the best alternative by many, if not most, Afghans. It's hard to argue that the U. That is easy. It's about following deadly orders, having such a strong commitment to a cause that the soldiers are willing to die, like going "over the top" in World War I. It does not look like that was ever approached in the mock American-style Afghan Army. A key indicator of probable success in war is the age of the soldiers. This point was emphasized by Frank Viviano, a great war correspondent for The San Francisco Chronicle , reporting on the early phase of the Yugoslav wars, when the Serbs overran the Croats.

If men go to war, they have committed to die for their cause. They are on a mission. In recent wars, the North Vietnamese sent their men to fight our conscript youth. Kurds versus uncommitted, often conscript Syrians and Iraqis. In the War of Israeli Independence, Israeli men and women, outnumbered and outgunned, fought Egyptian and Syrian youth. Ben Gurion would not even let the Kibbutzim evacuate women and children. They had to win and they mostly did.

They had a harder time with the disciplined Arab Legion. In each of these cases the men were often less equipped, often fewer in number. If you want a truly brutal war, find one where both sides sent their men—the American Civil War. Sadly, the Taliban are men committed to their cause. For most of the past 20 years it has been pitiful to hear how the Americans are "training" those benighted Afghan soldiers. Coupled with an Afghan government that offered no leadership, no commitment to any cause other than corruption , this was doomed to failure.

Recognizing what could have been fought for is too long for this venue, but I will offer a recognition that there are four main ethnicities in Afghanistan: Pashtun, Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara. These people are really different, and I venture all would have fought for their own people, their own communities. Certainly the horribly abused and persecuted Hazara Shia and Asiatic deserved better. Yet we created a "national" Afghan army organized as a fantasy version of the American army. If a fetus is a person and abortion is murder, there are many things that follow from this that anti-abortion advocates seem too scared to say.

To wit: the mother is a first-degree murderer; the doctor is a murderer and likely a serial hit man; women who miscarry could be subject to coroner's inquests; a child conceived while in the United States is a U. After the first two items, the suggestions are a bit less obvious and are either profoundly cruel miscarriages or complex bureaucratically, but they all follow logically from the assertion that a fetus is a full-fledged child. Finally, I have never heard a serious proposal for preventing rich people from using interstate or international travel to obtain abortions. This suggests to me that the goal of many is to prevent "those irresponsible people" from getting abortions and to punish them with the burden of raising a child, while the rich should have the convenience of avoiding parenthood at will.

My personal opinion is that most anti-abortion advocates do not hold the fetus-is-a-child opinion deeply and that their implied position on appropriate punishment is a "tell. So I put it to the readers. If a Democratic politician running for office were to say this in a speech, would it get him any crossover votes from conservatives? Or am I dreaming? Paul, MN, writes : I imagine the back-and-forth over abortion could continue unabated if you allowed it. If you'll permit, I would like to add my own two cents.

I was entertained by one letter-writer who proposed a train on a track that will run over either a child or a fertilized egg in a test tube. True, I would choose to run over the test tube. I would also choose to run over a year-old person versus a young child, yet I could not use that choice to condone killing year-olds. The train hypothetical may make us choose one life over another, but it doesn't tell us which lives are human or not. Personally, I consider myself pro-choice, but struggle with "where to draw the line. But I also believe that humanity does not begin at conception and that at some early point in the pregnancy a woman should have the absolute right to terminate. That some believe a zygote or blastocyst is a human life is of no consequence to me without evidence that we should consider it so "it will become a human life" is not enough—so will an unfertilized egg or a sperm cell, if they meet.

There's a reason that we've gotten nowhere on this issue, folks—it's a complicated one. If you think you have a simple answer, you haven't thought hard enough. However, the lead item by J. Let me qualify that I am a fervent atheist and have no agenda or support for the Catholic Church or any other. However the argument that says, "Pick one of the two, abortion or contraception," fundamentally misunderstands the point. While I think it is wrong, the church's stance is perfectly consistent.

If you believe humans should not be contradicting God's will and killing embryos or preventing the creation of life, that is a consistent viewpoint and I respect it while strongly disagreeing. As opposed to right-wing support for the death penalty and against abortion which is indeed contradictory. We all need to see the other side's view when it is logical and consistent and work against it through argument—to contrast with the Majorie Taylor Greene-style insanity. What Christians call "The Bible" is only such because councils agreed to it—a series of them. They felt they weren't making a new decision but were ratifying what the Church believed.

But there were, of course, disagreements. And there were other books that were included in early canons, but just not by the Church Universal—only in certain areas. In an overly-simplistic reading of history, they were so busy arguing about in what manner Jesus was both divine and human that they ran out of time and said, "Let's just accept Athanasius' canon. Here's the interesting part: There were five books that were considered canonical by parts of the Early Church and were not considered heretical at the time and largely are still not considered heretical , but they did not make the final cut.

Many of the prominent leaders of the Early Church considered them to be canonical. And three of them—Didache, Epistle of Barnabas, and Revelation of Peter—directly state that abortion is immoral, as opposed to infanticide. Wherever one might fall on the current political discourse on this issue, and although these books are not part of the current canons, they do reflect a general milieu of the Early Church in rejecting abortion as immoral. As a Catholic, I would like to amplify on Z 's response from an "inside baseball" point of view. I think the problem with the "next guy will reverse the stance" argument is that it assumes a legal positivist framework which is not at all the approach taken by the Catholic hierarchy.

The attitude of the hierarchy and of traditional Catholics is that the pope's job is not to make determinations on issue of faith and morals, but instead to understand and interpret faith and morals as dictated by God, and to implement rules which help to promote those morals. Even when speaking ex cathedra , the pope is not infallibly making policy so much as infallibly comprehending God's intention on a certain issue.

One might say, within this view, that the pope and Church serve as the executive and judicial branches, but God is the sole legislative branch. And there are no checks and balances against the Divine! In the case of Church practice, the argument is relatively easy e. Change in doctrine does in fact happen, but as Z points out, usually in small degrees and over centuries, as a small development is usually easier to explain than a large one. Also, in response to D. I would like to point out that there are "moderate" pro-lifers such as myself who believe that 1 there are real societal and cultural pressures that give women very good reasons to have abortions, and yet 2 the fetus is a living thing and therefore deserves some consideration.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to advocate not impose, but advocate, as participants in a pluralistic society for policies that will allow more women to want to have their babies. These policies include better childcare in universities and workplaces, harsher penalties for deadbeat dads, etc. It is our hope that, by supporting moderate pro-life organizations such as Feminists For Life and Democrats for Life of America , we can promote a society that both gives more babies the chance at life as well as giving women more and better choices for their lives.

I am not so naive as to think there are no pro-lifers who do indeed fit D. I am naive enough to hope that E-V. He started his career as a segregationist, not an abortion opponent. What motivated Falwell to become more political was the Green v. Kennedy decision in three years before Roe in , which prohibited federal funding for religious schools that practiced segregation. Religious conservatives in the s and s were better known for their opposition to "miscegenation. However, by , segregation was losing favor with the general public, so Falwell made the decision to pivot to opposing abortion, gay rights, and "feminism," the trifecta that the Moral Majority was established upon.

From brief internet research, and a conversation I once had with a Theravada Buddhist monk, I have the opposite impression. I would say the Theravada Buddhist position is that abortion is murder. A fetus does not breathe. Human fetuses do not use their lungs for respiration, but they do take in oxygen through the placenta and convert it into energy. They would therefore satisfy a scientific requirement that something has to breathe to be alive. I don't think there is such a requirement, though. It was recently discovered that salminicola parasites have no respiration system at all. The consensus view seems to be that salminicola are living organisms anyway.

I have no delusion that I can somehow out-argue the countless well-spoken readers on this site whose academic credentials leave mine in the dust. Many can and possibly will outmaneuver what I'm writing verbally and make any portion of my words appear frivolous, and I'm at peace with that. But there are still two important things you need to hear from pro-life Americans: we're not who you think we are, and we're not going away.

As has been pointed out many times on this site, looking exclusively at someone's presidential voting record and cited "most important issue" is a weak approach to understanding political futures, let alone understanding that voter's character. We in the pro-life camp are not all religious and not all Trump supporters. We get no sick joy from "controlling women" and have no doubts as to what a personal and painful journey pregnancy can be.

Many of us support a more compassionate immigration policy, better environmental stewardship, and tax reform beyond "trickle-down" cuts for the wealthiest. The second point, which I mean not to be threatening or even annoying, but rather factual: The pro-life movement isn't going anywhere. We're not going to die off or be shamed or ridiculed into disowning our beliefs.

We aren't convinced by pointing out stronger abortion rights in other, usually whiter, countries. Frustrating hypocrisy from religious or political groups that many of us aren't even part of admittedly weakens the moral high ground in the public perception but doesn't obviate the issue. I don't care what any political or religious official says: Like many pro-choice individuals that I adamantly disagree with yet can respect, I will not abandon my conscience out of convenience or pressure. For many of you on this site who seem to accept these ideas about pro-life thinkers and are willing to limit your criticisms to pointing out logical fallacies that only weaken our movement from within, I appreciate your civility. There's almost no chance you'll cause me to revert to your side, but you definitely get me thinking of how we handle things "maybe we should insist to the bishops that a Communion-denial policy should be all-or-nothing with pro-choice and pro-death penalty politicians".

For the rest of you who can't accept that we deserve a place in the national dialogue and can't explain your distaste for our views without citing clerical abuse or the GOP, I'm sorry for what you're putting yourself through. You will endure many more election cycles of rolling your eyes and incredulously gasping "How is this debate still around? Also as an FYI, there are, in fact, thousands of pro-life non-profit organizations dedicated to assisting women in crisis pregnancies that reduce abortion rates without propping up any political parties or candidates. America: The Jesuit Review has a small sample list , a few of which I can personally vouch for as entirely apolitical.

Feel free to join in the good works, or at least read up on what we do beyond enabling the GOP with its single biggest wedge issue. What P. What I see is a breakdown of the social safety net. So if there is an increase in crime in urban areas, it's not the citizens perpetrating it on each other. It's the grifters at the top who are taking all they can and are leaving scraps behind. I live in Los Angeles, and yes, I do see tents lining underpasses and the river, and more than usual. But I haven't seen an uptick in actual crime, even downtown. I'd be more concerned about the meth labs in rural areas.

None of the things P. Can P. I suggest that P. That make it easier for homeless people to obtain mental health services and housing? I definitely think it's a crime that a country as wealthy as the United States fails to adequately house and provide health care to its citizens. Things are undoubtedly better in Denmark, where the citizens are more willing to pay for government services than Americans are.

Let me assure you that none of the problems described can reasonably be solved with arrests or fines. We know this to be true, as cities and states have been criminalizing camping in public, panhandling, being crazy on the street corner, etc. I do agree that Seattle and other cities with these issues need to do something, but continuing to cast it as amenable to a law enforcement solution only serves to perpetuate both the myth and the reality of homelessness. I've spent the last 10 years of my life working in the field of homelessness data.

I now live in a town of not quite 1, people but the majority of my adult life was spent in Austin, TX, and I know about urban homelessness and how efforts to criminalize it affect things. In the s, the city passed ordinances forbidding public camping and sitting or lying on the sidewalk in their efforts to handle the homelessness problem. All these ordinances did was force people to hide their campsites away from public view. When the city repealed these ordinances in , there was a hue and cry as it seemed the population of people experiencing homelessness was exploding when, in reality, they were just seeing the true magnitude of a problem that had been swept under the rug for 25 years.

There was a small increase in the annual census but there was not a dramatic swing in the number of people served throughout the community in the year following the ordinance change. Decriminalizing homelessness did not dramatically change the scope of the problem, just as criminalizing it in the first place did little to reduce it. I could go on and on as this is a particular pet peeve of mine, and one about which I know quite a bit, but there are better sources of information on homelessness for anyone who truly cares about solving this problem.

This is a problem we know how to solve if communities would only quit spinning their wheels with quack solutions and follow the science. I'll start by saying the problems they mentioned are a problem. It's more visible now as a result of closures due to the pandemic and fewer people being downtown. A city councilor who, from my point of view, has been a very toxic presence, hasn't helped, and having the last three mayors go one-and-done isn't helpful either in finding workable solutions.

While acknowledging problems exist, it's not a surprise that it's more "shocking" if you've been away for a significant length of time 14 years in P. Further, national and local media outlets have sensationalized the problem also not helpful in search of solutions. I could probably go on much longer about city politics, especially with mayoral and council elections this fall, but for now, I yield back. We stayed downtown, walking distance from Pike's Pier and Pioneer Square.

Or, at least, I thought we had until I read about the Seattle that P. Surely, one of us must have been in a parallel universe Seattle. At no point did we feel unsafe walking around the city, and while we were using Google maps it was, after all, Seattle for navigation, we still relied on street signs to inform us where we were, and they were easy to read and not to any noticeable extent covered in graffiti. As for garbage, we remarked often at how clean and how beautiful the city of Seattle was. We visited Ballard and Bainbridge Island, took a boat tour of the city and yes, by Pioneer Square there was a section where some homeless and others with problems were roaming the area, but it wasn't anything threatening or significantly worse than in any of our major cities, especially during this pandemic.

I often hear people in Los Angeles and other cities talking about how horrible America's cities have become, with rampant crime and liberal polices destroying their once safe and beautiful suburbia, and regardless of what you explain about actual crime rates and other imagined horrors of their surroundings, they will just regale you with stories of others who have been victimized by all that is wrong with modern day American cities.

Luckily, none of them have actually been victimized, but they've heard stories from "everyone else," and you start to realize that their major, unsaid gripe is that the place they are living is no longer the place they grew up in 40 and 50 years ago. And for those who haven't been to Seattle, all I can say is the Emerald City should be on everyone's destination list.

Beautiful area, friendly people and great food. As a lifelong Washingtonian who is quite familiar with Seattle, I have to say that the city is abysmal compared to former days. The streets are threatening and uninviting. The charm has vanished in "Crane City. Parks Commissioner Henry Stern, aware of the property damage and sensitive to complaints from "terrorized" parents, joggers, and senior citizens about roving canines in city parks, now is enforcing the city's leash law, requiring owners to keep their dogs leashed between 9 AM and 9 PM , unless they are using one of the city's dog runs.

So far, despite howls from some pet owners, spot checks show the percentage of unleashed dogs down dramatically, as owners have gotten the message. Mail to the Parks Department has run three-to-one in favor of strict enforcement. S tern's initiative follows closely on the heels of the Giuliani administration's proposed new dangerous-dog legislation, announced earlier this year.

Predictably, the proposal has enraged dog owners. According to New York City Health Commissioner Neal Cohen, the city needs the new law because of its high number of dog-inflicted injuries. The existing dangerous-dog law, on the books since , has been ineffective in practice, because it requires the Department of Health, which adjudicates dog-bite cases, to prove that a dog wasn't "provoked" before it can label the animal dangerous and require it to be muzzled or impounded.

As then-Corporation Counsel Paul Crotty complained after a pit- bull attack in killed a Queens man, "It's a dopey law that puts the emphasis on protection of due-process rights of dogs. But those priorities are just what dog advocates want. When I described to him the fear my wife and other young mothers in our Bronx neighborhood had about using the public park when pit bulls were on the loose, he defended the dogs.

Carvill seconds Weisberg's objection that the city's proposal threatens the due-process protections of pet owners. But the law's biggest defect, he says, is that it singles out a specific breed, in its requirement that pit-bull owners buy liability insurance. The city's desire to regulate pit bulls is in seeming conflict with a state law, similar to those 11 other states have passed, that bars breed-specific local legislation. For Carvill, all dogs are created equal; different breeds don't have different hereditary characteristics. B ut he's wrong, and dead wrong if we're talking about pit bulls. All men may be created equal, but not all dogs.

Says Katherine Houpt, director of the Animal Behavior Clinic at Cornell and author of Domestic Animal Behavior : "Different breeds have genetic predispositions to certain kinds of behavior, though that can be influenced by how they are raised. The pit bull is an innately aggressive breed, often owned by someone who wants an aggressive dog, so they're going to encourage it. Pit bulls have been bred specifically to be aggressive. They're descended from the now- extinct old English "bulldogge," a big, tenacious breed used in the brutal early- nineteenth-century sport of bull baiting, in which rowdy spectators watched dogs tear apart an enraged bull. Victorian reformers, concerned about the coarsening effect bull baiting had on its devotees, banned it by the early s, but enterprising bull baiters merely migrated to an equally bloody sport: organized dog fighting.

As Carl Semencic, author of several informative books on guard dogs, and a big pit-bull fan, describes it, the bulldogge owners made a striking discovery: "a cross between the bulldogge and any of the game [i. To preserve the bull-and-terrier's pugnacious traits, the dogs were bred only to dogs of the same cross. Thus was born the pit-bull terrier, "the most capable fighting dog known to modern man," Semencic enthuses. Though breeders, realizing the pit bull was an attractive dog when it wasn't scrapping, bred a less feisty version—the American Staffordshire terrier "Pete" of the old Our Gang comedy series is a well-known representative —the pit-bull terrier is first and last a fighting dog.

Its breeding history separates it from other tough dogs like Doberman pinschers and rottweilers, which have been bred to guard their masters and their property. Pit bulls are genetically wired to kill other dogs. T he pit bull's unusual breeding history has produced some bizarre behavioral traits, de- scribed by The Economist' s science editor in an article published a few years ago, at the peak of a heated British controversy over dangerous dogs that saw the pit bull banned in England. First, the pit bull is quicker to anger than most dogs, probably due to the breed's unusually high level of the neurotransmitter L-tyrosine.

Second, pit bulls are frighteningly tenacious; their attacks frequently last for 15 minutes or longer, and nothing—hoses, violent blows or kicks—can easily stop them. That's because of the third behavioral anomaly: the breed's remarkable insensitivity to pain. Most dogs beaten in a fight will submit the next time they see the victor. Not a defeated pit bull, who will tear into his onetime vanquisher.

This, too, has to do with brain chemistry. The body releases endorphins as a natural painkiller. Pit bulls seem extra-sensitive to endorphins and may generate higher levels of the chemical than other dogs. Endorphins are also addictive: "The dogs may be junkies, seeking pain so they can get the endorphin buzz they crave," The Economist suggests. Finally, most dogs warn you before they attack, growling or barking to tell you how angry they are—"so they don't have to fight," ASPCA advisor and animal geneticist Stephen Zawistowski stresses. Not the pit bull, which attacks without warning.

Most dogs, too, will bow to signal that they want to frolic. Again, not the pit bull, which may follow an apparently playful bow with a lethal assault. In short, contrary to the writings of Vicki Hearne, a well-known essayist on animals who—in a bizarre but emotionally charged confusion—equates breed-specific laws against pit bulls as a kind of "racist propaganda," the pit bull is a breed apart. Pit-bull expert Semencic makes a more sophisticated argument as to why pit bulls shouldn't be singled out for regulation.

Pit bulls, he says, were bred not to be aggressive to people. But Semencic's argument assumes that the culling of man-aggressive dogs is still going on—which it isn't. As Robin Kovary, a New York-based dog breeder and pit-bull fancier, acknowledges, "Once the word got out, 20 years ago or so, to youths who wanted a tough dog to show off with, the breed passed into less than responsible hands—kids who wanted the dogs to be as aggressive as they could be.

Y et Kovary is at least partially right when she says, "It's the two-legged beast, not the four-legged one, we have to worry about. Raised responsibly, the pit bull's good side can come to the fore. But pit bulls have become enmeshed in the brutality of underclass culture, magnifying the breed's predisposition to aggression. Pit bulls are its biggest problem. More than 60, animals, half of them dogs, entered the shelter last year.

Do Justice In The Eumenides And The Penelopiad a favor and Herbert Hoovers Progressive Movement on facebook with your related correspondences. Notify me of new comments via email. Panhandling Fallacy believed Relationship Between The President And The Executive Branch Jason Divorced Hispanic Family in it and Angie Bachmanns The Power Of Habit felt the things he didnt say as Essay On Self Interest.