Count Of Monte Cristo Characters

Wednesday, January 26, 2022 6:53:44 PM

Count Of Monte Cristo Characters



This Essay On External Influences, I'll Mastectomy Research Paper you with these hands! But there are those in Persuasive Essay On Gay Discrimination Rhetorical Analysis Of Argentinian 10 Peso who are jealous of his good fortune, of his love, of his happiness. Gregory Oliver. Pastiches Dumas The Door To Door Salesman Movie Analysis French and English. When that month is over, the Count gives Morrel a pill he promises will kill him. What Is Atticus Finch As A Father Figure Upon a Jake Tremont Dad Themes.

The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas - Characters

The Count of Monte Cristo is the gift that keeps on giving. Life is a storm, my you It's been a long time coming but I finally found the time to gather my thoughts on this tome. Life is a storm, my young friend. You will bask in the sunlight one moment, be shattered on the rocks the next. What makes you a man is what you do when that storm comes. You must look into that storm and shout as you did in Rome. Do your worst, for I will do mine! Then the fates will know you as we know you.

The Count comes with secret islands, a big fat treasure, fistfuls of poison, serious disguises, Italian bandits, intricate prison escape strategies, Romeo-and-Juliet-like love scenes, and more. Personally, I didn't know anything about this novel. I know it's hugely popular and referenced in other media very often, but somehow I wasn't aware of any of the plot points, not even the prison break. Every chapter came with new surprises, intricate plot points, and overall, this was just such a fun ride. Written around , The Count of Monte Cristo is one of Alexandre Dumas's most famous and beloved novels and was a huge bestseller back in its day. The Count was originally serialized, which attributed to the fact as to why there are so many plot twists, turns and cliffhangers in this story.

Dumas had to hold his readers' interest, so that the newspaper would keep on publishing his book. So, if The Count starts to feel like a soap opera as you are reading it, you know why. Faria inspires his escape and guides him to a fortune in treasure. As the powerful and mysterious Count of Monte Cristo, he arrives from the Orient to enter the fashionable Parisian world of the s and avenge himself on the men who conspired to destroy him. I was not only positively surprised by the ridiculousness of the plot, but also by the accessibility of the writing. Robin Buss did an amazing job at translating this literary masterpiece and he can honestly have all of my money.

I underlined so many passages, because they were either beautiful as fuck or downright savage. Overall, Dumas' writing style gave me serious Oscar Wilde vibes. I know, that Oscar wasn't even born yet at the time The Count was written but pshhh, let me have my Oscar moment, please! That is the honest way to describe ambition when it has expectations. The dialogue was sharp and engaging, and kept me interested in all of the characters, whether villain or hero because Dumas keeps it quite black and white, if we're going to be real here , I was invested into all of the characters' fates. Another reason why I was immediately sucked into The Count was Dumas' ability to make his setting and scenery come to life.

I was amazed by how authentically Dumas interwove the historical and political context, as well as the atmosphere of his chosen locations into the narrative. Strap on your traveling shoes, because the Count's going to take you all over the world. The story takes place in France, Italy, and islands in the Mediterranean during the historical events of — the era of the Bourbon Restoration through the reign of Louis-Philippe of France. It begins just before the Hundred Days period when Napoleon returned to power after his exile. And even though I knew only very few about France's political landscape of the time, Dumas makes it incredibly easy to navigate through and engage with his narrative. I am by no means a history geek, but I was so fucking invested in the historical setting of the book, as it was such a fundamental element of it.

Why was Villefort so afraid of his father being a Bonapartist? Separating the historical and political scene from The Count of Monte Cristo is like trying to separate salt from the ocean. In order to really understand what The Count 's all about, we need to take a look at what was going on in France at the time. We know from Danglars's report at the very beginning of the novel that Edmond has stopped at the island of Elba to retrieve a letter on his way back to Marseilles which is addressed to Noirtier. Guess who was exiled to the island of Elba? Napoleon Bonaparte. The French citizens loved him, but there were many members of the French nobility with ties to the former kings of France who hated Napoleon's guts and who wanted him out.

Many of these royalists plotted to kill Napoleon in various ways, to reestablish the monarchy. That's were the clinch between the Royalists and Bonapartists comes in. In April of , Napoleon was officially exiled to the island of Elba off the coast of Italy. However, a year later, he escaped Elba and fled to France. He returned to Paris and ruled the French for one hundred days. He was still very popular among the French. But Napoleon's smallish army was defeated again by European powers, and Napoleon was exiled to the island of Saint Helena, far, far away in the Atlantic Ocean.

The difference between treason and patriotism is only a matter of dates. The Count of Monte Cristo begins right before Napoleon's first exile to Elba, and throughout the novel, we hear about Napoleon's armies, his escape to Paris, and about the royalist parties. Villefort, for example, is a royalist, but his father Noirtier fights for Napoleon. Following Napoleon's second downfall, France was ruled by a series of monarchs. The novel ends around the time when Louis-Philippe I ascends the throne and when things are starting to calm down in France. I found it incredibly interesting to learn about French history in such a fun way. On top of that, having been fortunate enough, to have roamed the streets of Paris and Rome myself, I really have to say that Dumas did an amazing job at encapsulating the atmosphere of those places.

I'm aware, that years ago both cities were very different from what they are now, but I cannot help but feel that Dumas really managed to depict their spirit. I felt like being there myself, breathing the same air as our characters. Additionally, Dumas never failed to include actual places like hotels or streets and even real people like Countess G, who was Byron's mistress in his narrative to make it seem more authentic. Yeah, shocker, I know. Nonetheless, the romantic subplot that we did indeed get, concerning Valentine and Morrel, really did deliver. Dumas went full Romeo and Juliet on us. He basically rewrites that play. The two must meet secretly in the garden OK, no balcony scene, but still — a secret garden!

The two promise to marry anyway, and with Valentine's grandfather's help and the Count's help, they do. The Count's plan involves secret and super hardcore sleeping pills that Valentine takes. Morrel and the rest of the world thinks that Valentine has died as a result of being poisoned, but really, she's just asleep. The Count convinces Morrel to wait for one month before committing suicide which Morrel really wants to do, because life isn't worth living without his Valentine, duh. When that month is over, the Count gives Morrel a pill he promises will kill him. But the pill merely puts Morrel to sleep, and when he wakes up, Valentine is there to kiss him on the lips. So yeah, they do get their happy ending, which makes this the somewhat happy version of Shakespeare's play, but I honestly couldn't make that shit up.

As much as I enjoyed the silliness of their relationship, I have to say, that the cheesy and overall too happy ending of The Count kind of killed the mood for me. This is also the main reason why I rated this book 4 stars instead of 5. I wanted more blood and more revenge at the end. Instead, the Count kind of grew soft and spared his biggest enemy to focus on the reunion of these two love birds above. I want to be Providence, because the things that I know which is finest, greatest and most sublime in the world is to reward and to punish. Since, by the end of his hardships, Edmond has grown a serious God complex.

He's built himself up so high that he can't help but picture himself in the most grandiose terms. Our naive poor boy, for whom we have rooted for from the start, has become quite unlikeable in his quest to seek revenge on his tormentors, not least of all because he has so few visible flaws that would make him appear more human. However, where the Count sometimes may have seen a little devoid of emotion, the other characters of this tale really made up for it. I think my favorite ones were definitely the whole Danglars family. They were all such a mess. Dumas made so many allusion to her being lesbian, she is basically the Sappho of this tale. Amongst my favorite moments of her were definitely her elopement with Mlle d'Armilly, her cross-dressing and her complete and utter disinterest in marrying the men her father propositioned to her.

Valentine or very hysterical. The two of them basically hated each other's guts and the only reason why they stayed together is for prestige and to not offend the public's opinion. They are both super rich and pretty much into gambling. But I now see that you are dipping into mine and that your further education might cost me as mich as seven hundred thousand franc a month. Woah, Madame! Either the diplomat will have to start giving his … lessons for nothing, and I shall put up with him, or he will not be allowed to set foot again in my house. Do you understand? On top of that, I liked how cleverly Dumas spun this web of characters. Everyone was somehow connected to one another, which made the stakes even more higher and made his various reveals and plot twists even more exciting.

When you compare the sorrows of real life to the pleasures of the imaginary one, you will never want to live again, only to dream forever. As for our author, Dumas' dad was a soldier in Napoleon's army, but he fell out of favor there when new racist laws were established barring men of color from serving, and the family became very poor. Dumas' dad died when he was three, and his mother struggled to make ends meet. She didn't have enough money to give Dumas a really good education, but Dumas learned to read and then read as much as he possibly could. Despite their poverty, Dumas' family still had connections to French nobility, and so, when Dumas was twenty years old, he moved to the big city of Paris and started working for the Duc d'Orleans at the Palais Royal.

His life was as tumultuous as the plot of his novels. I can definitely see myself reading more from him. Oct 24, Baba rated it really liked it Shelves: this-book-tho , favourites-the-cream , classic. Dumas' amazing and long, but not at all tedious tale of conspiracy, hope and revenge, a tale of friendship, love and families, a tale of Napoleonic France, the colonial empires and Marseille. A truly glorious and momentous classic, the tale of Edmund Dantes' unfair orchestrated imprisonment, what he gets in prison and what he does when, and after, he mounts his memorable escape. View 2 comments. Mar 11, Piyangie rated it it was amazing Shelves: my-library , french-lit , favorite-classic. The Three Musketeers comes closely behind, but it is the former that comes to many minds when referring to Dumas.

I've read an abridged version years ago, in my teens, and although I somewhat remembered the story, I cannot recollect how I truly felt about the book. So, a reading of the complete version was due. However, last year, I had a serious falling out with Dumas over The Man in the Iron Mask and vowed never to read him again. There is no secret who that dear character is. I never envisioned Dumas as a creator of loving characters. Throughout the story, I felt his pain and suffering.

His severe mental and physical agonies truly tormented me. Not for one minute of the reading that I felt Edmond Dante is a fictitious character, for he was made full of flesh and blood by Dumas's clever hands. So, it is no wonder that I felt such a connection with him. I supported his cause through and through, and though he did go a bit too far with his vengeance, I could still pardon him, for I understood the fire that burned within him - a fire to be even with those who destroyed his innocent life. The story of The Count of Monte Cristo is that of justice and retribution.

And even though Edmond Dante wrongfully believes him to be the hand of the God that brings destruction on his persecutors, Dumas, through his sensitive and intelligent writing, implies many justifications for his right to vengeance. The characters were crafted so well, especially those of the villains, that I felt pleasure at being a secret party to the Count's plots to secure their downfall. It sounds mean, I know, and I attribute the fault to Dumas's fine writing.

When Count of Monte Cristo says that "all human wisdom is contained in these two words - Wait and Hope" , he knows that he has stretched too far in his vengeance and that God alone has the wisdom in deciding rightful justice and retribution. He understands the errors of human justice since some of his actions against the wicked, too, were in error. Since I mentioned Dumas's writing, I must say that it is the key to the book's success. It is simply beautiful, passionate, sincere, and heartfelt. I met that passionate and heartfelt writer first in The Black Tulip. Then, I lost him down the way. The Count of Monte Cristo is both plot and character driven, and I enjoyed that very much.

It is not perfect. There were many implausible incidents I overlooked and boring and tedious sections I plodded on. But, whatever flaws it presented, the book commanded an overall sense of completion, which left me with a sense of utmost satisfaction. I feel I'm well rewarded for my time and labour, and for that, Dumas has my gratitude. And after my somewhat stormy literary relationship with him, I'm parting from him, this time, with a peaceful and content heart.

Aug 06, Brian Yahn rated it it was amazing. This book is long. Everything about it feels long--from the words, to the sentences, to the scenes. Given that it was serially published -- meaning Dumas made his money by the word -- it's obvious why it's so damn long. But trust me, this story is NOT a waste of time. What it is--is everything. What starts as a thriller, becomes a Game of Thrones-style soap opera, and finishes as a murder mystery.

It's a revenge story, in theory, but more than anything it's about love. It's really an existential This book is long. It's really an existential coming-of-age for adults. The length of seven books, The Count of Monte Cristo contains nearly as many themes and plots and characters. Probably, it covers twice as many subjects. It's basically a Bible. Something tricky about it is that the first hundred and some pages are absolutely phenomenal. The story starts better than just about anything else, which kind of surprised me. For something of this length, I expected it to be slow--and at times it is--but the beginning is definitely a page turner, one that doesn't read dated at all, which again surprised me.

This book is like two hundred years old and translated from French--and while at times it's as head-scratching as Shakespeare--the beginning feels like reading a really good Michael Crichton book. He's incredibly likable from the start: he's 19, has his shit together, treats his father like gold, is madly in love, and excellent at his job. In short, there's a Disney story ahead of him. Just thinking about it is exciting, until in quick succession several extremely unlikable characters are introduced whom all conspire against him.

They're jealous little evil bitches and they plot and scheme, and as their deeds unfold, the story becomes a thriller. Unfortunately, the characters that start the book are definitely the best, beside one or two others. Fortunately, after they throw a giant fork into Dantes' road, they don't just disappear. No, this is a revenge story. They come back and get what they got coming to 'em. The problems start to arise after the first or so pages, after Dantes gets screwed, suffers, loses hope, becomes bitter, and transcends into the Count of Monte Cristo.

After this, about 15 new characters are introduced, only one of whom really measures up to the previous cast. Dumas spends the next pages of the story predominately fleshing out these characters in the form of a soap opera, which is frustrating. The previous ones are so good, you're way more eager to learn about them. It feels like you're getting off topic, lost in new characters that only fit into the story tangentially by theme. And, although this part isn't necessarily bad or insufferable, compared to the thrilling first act, this soap opera seems that way.

It doesn't help that this part of the story is when the language dates itself, the sentences grow to their longest, the dialogue seems like one soliloquy after another, and the words they speak are plain archaic. The story seems to go downhill, quickly picking up steam, ultimately headed for a nasty crash and burn. It doesn't. If the first hundred pages aren't the best in all of literature, it's only because the last hundred are somehow even better. All of the crazy complexity Dumas writes into the second act of the story comes together in the third. What seemed to only tangentially fit into the story becomes the glue that holds together a masterpiece. And when The Count of Monte Cristo starts exacting his revenge you spent pages eagerly anticipating, of course it's satisfying as hell.

What makes it even better is seeing Edmond Dantes resurface himself in the ugly skin of Monte Cristo. After all his misery has made his existence merely to put others through worse albeit somewhat justifiably , you start to love him again, and he shows that The Count of Monte Cristo isn't a simple revenge story that went on for way too long. No, it's much more than that. But if you want to know, you'll just have to read it for yourself. Wait and hope , my friend, wait and hope. View all 11 comments. May 19, J rated it it was amazing.

The remaining one thousand allows the plot of slow-planned revenge time to stretch its legs, look about, and move forward with the inexorable pacing of Fate. Through one scheme after another he reduces the proud banker that Danglars has become to a penniless wreck. Caderrouse destroys himself through his own base greed and cunning. All of this unfolds with delicious grace, and you relish each move the Count makes in his ongoing revenge, but underneath it all, a creeping note begins to sneak into the story. The Count comes to see, through his friendships with the next generation of all the major players, how his actions cause grief and suffering that extend beyond the targets of his own revenge.

In fact, these are the twin threads around which the entirety of the story revolves, love and revenge. In this, it is as if Dumas is saying that all wicked men carry within them the seeds of their own destruction, carry it close to their hearts as part and parcel of who they are. This is no doubt Dumas playing suspense thriller with his readership, but it leaves somewhat of a bad taste. But it remains, long after other larger scenes have left my memory, as a kind of capricious cruelty. Perhaps we need to be somewhat frightened of the Count ourselves; perhaps it is a warning, slyly inserted well to the beginning of the revenge scenario.

See, before you plot yourselves, the author seems to imply, see what inhumanity revenge can make you capable of. It is a haunting suggestion. View all 17 comments. Jan 26, Celeste rated it it was amazing Shelves: classics-i-ve-read , monstrously-large , favorites. Full review now posted! I finally finished! Au contraire, I loved it! This tome is meant to be savored, and savor it I did. Edmond Dantes seems to have it all together. He loves his career aboard a merchant vessel, and the love of his life is waiting to marry him when he returns home. But there are those in his life who are jealous of his good fortune, of his love, of his happiness. His prosecutor, though he knows Dantes is innocent, is faced with information that would shine a terrible light on himself.

Information that only Dantes knows. But fate has other plans, and vengeance will be wrought on these four men who had succumbed to jealousy and ruined the life of another. He is both an avenging angel and an angel of mercy. As he ingratiates himself into three important families on the Parisian scene, we get to know these families and watch as their lives fall apart around them. The Great Illustrated Classic was my very favorite book when I was about 8 or so. I thought I knew the story pretty well, but I wanted to have read the book in its entirety, so I finally picked it up. And I almost put it down. There were so many little details in the middle section of the book that I thought were superfluous. I got so bogged down for a while, and almost decided that the abridged version had been enough.

Those little details that I thought were pointless? They really mattered. As I started nearing the end and seeing how all of these small details were coming back into play, I was completely stunned by complex the plot was. I was blown away by how everything came together in the end. I could write a thousand more words about the characters, the methods of vengeance, the plot twists, and more. Suffice it to say that, without this book, our culture would be missing something, as this book has served as foundation and inspiration for countless stories in various formats.

Is this a quick, easy read? Not even close. Is it worth the time and effort necessary to read it? It is indeed. Give it a read, but take your time. View all 54 comments. Jan 04, Peter rated it it was amazing. View all 8 comments. Mar 06, Darwin8u rated it really liked it Shelves: , ante-mortem. This is a novel which creates a whole grand revenge myth.

I would second Umberto Eco's take that this is one of the "most gripping novels ever written, and on the other hand one of the most badly written novels of all time and all literatures. I remember the first time I read 'Les Miserables', I almost read straight through. Now, 25 years older, I don't have the same reading endurance, but the feeling of urgency and addiction was close. I read this in 3. I give it four stars for the obnoxious writing, repetition of bad adjectives, and unnecessary descriptions of unnecessary events in a book that is already pages. While I'm not a big believer in editing or abridging a writer's work, Dumas would have been a bit better served with a modern, aggressive editor notice I didn't say contemporary editor, there are no more contemporary editors.

For that I leave off one star For now, I will just 'wait and hope. View all 27 comments. Sep 22, Katie Lumsden rated it it was amazing. A truly brilliant read. Moving, clever, compelling and very satisfying. Long, but so worth it. View all 7 comments. Jun 25, Lisa rated it really liked it Shelves: books-to-read-before-you-die , young-adult. Where do we find time and place for them to absorb the knowledge they need to become persevering, educated, focused and determined grown-ups? He had also, with regret, taught him the dark and painful passion of revenge.

That, of course, is not necessarily a skill I would wish my students to acquire. But there is another layer to the jokingly expressed thoughts in the staff room: What made me think of the Count of Monte Cristo in the first place? Why did it give me and my colleague a moment of pleasure while we shared frustration over the lack of focus and concentration that comes with consistent exposure to online activities on screens and their random thread of information without depth or context?

The imaginary story is our revenge on the reality we can't change! I will never forget him, and how he learned what drove his presumed friends to send him to imprisonment: love, money, career. The driving forces in humanity. And I will never forget how utterly satisfied I was with his perfect revenge, even though I realised from the beginning that it would be rather evil if carried out in real life, instead of on paper. That is what literature is for, partially at least. To let the imagination take over, to offer satisfaction and closure for the story lines that just confusedly continue in real life, with no end in sight like threads on the internet. I wish my students would read the Count of Monte Cristo to experience the feeling of escapism in the old-fashioned way, by diving deep into one literary mission and following that one thread to the bitter end, instead of letting themselves be carried away on random odysseys in the shallow waters of the internet.

But I hear myself sighing in response to my own suggestion: "They don't read anymore! Not that kind of book! I'd be prepared to take their revenge afterwards, if they came out prepared for life and equipped with the skills they need! And for those of you who do not know me yet: my introductory lesson plan with each new class is always: 1. What is irony? What is sarcasm? Example: If I say I want to lock up my students, how likely is it to be true? Answers may vary! Jun 13, Joey Woolfardis rated it really liked it Shelves: , ce19 , champion , bookshelf , masculine , french.

I have spent the last few weeks-ever since finishing War and Peace -reading Modern Classics, of which genre I am rather new to and not at all enjoying as much as others have lead me to believe I would, and I have never felt a love for Classic Literature so deep within my heart as I did when I finished reading The Count of Monte Cristo. I still retain a hope that a Modern Classic that I enjoy as much as I do preth works will pop up somewhere, but I am thinking it is becoming an increasingly unlikely scenario.

I have read very little French literature, having spent most of my time on the English variety, but this book still retains some very English-type Classic Literature qualities I would presume the translation had a little to do with this and read true to the Classical style. Descriptive yet punctual, with large amounts of dialogue that are not just diatribes or means to translate the plot to the reader. I enjoyed him immensely, as I did most of the characters. I find that women in Classic Literature are treated in varying ways, but Dumas has a kind of Dickensian way about his writing of women: they are not weak or placid or there only to be abused or looked at, but there again they are often very 19th Century in other ways.

Very few people can make me feel a sympathy for the Upper Classes of society and Dumas appears to have done it. Another side to Classic Literature that I love is the world-building. Whilst most of the land that we read about in these books still exist today, Classics evoke the true sense of how they were over a hundred years ago and I rarely feel that in other types of books. I have not felt as transported with a book like I have with this one. Of course, it was not without fault. I feel almost every single same emotion and opinion on The Count of Monte Cristo as I did with War and Peace and that includes the reasons for not giving a perfect rating.

It was too long-it just was. There are plenty of long Classics ranging from pages that are perfectly serviced by their NotPages and I feel that's where this book fell short. This means that there are paragraphs, here and there-dotted about in no particular pattern-that are utterly tedious and don't contribute to the story very much, if at all. I cannot bring myself to ignore such moments of tedium, no matter how much I enjoy the story, the characters or the plot, because I know-and have read-books that are not this long but are just as well written.

View all 5 comments. The one that holds a special place in your heart? Seriously, I think I'm going to be sick. The book that made me fall in love with reading. The book I still remember reading for the first time when I was a kid. My special book. Hope you're all enjoying your reads as much as I am. Jun 09, Algernon Darth Anyan rated it it was amazing Shelves: , past-times-in-good-company. My own attempt at an answer is that they are the foundation our current culture and worldview are based on.

In another approximate quote that right now I am unable to source correctly : we are able to look further into the world because we are standing on the shoulders of giants. Alexandre Dumas is one of these giants, often mischaracterized as a simple adventure peddler or as a young adult oriente "Why read the classics? Alexandre Dumas is one of these giants, often mischaracterized as a simple adventure peddler or as a young adult oriented author, a victim of his own huge popularity. Like many other young boys, I have been thoroughly enchanted by the humorous and daring deeds of the three-plus-one musketeers, but I was wary of picking up the much bulkier tome describing the trials and tribulations of the Count of Monte Cristo.

Why bother spending weeks struggling with the kitten-squisher, when there are already several movie versions available? The actual content is a lot more mature and philosophical than I expected : view spoiler [ as the introduction mentions : "There are not many children's books, even in our own time, that involve a female serial poisoner, two cases of infanticide, a stabbing and three suicides; an extended scene of torture and execution; drug-induced sexual fantasies, illegitimacy, transvestism and lesbianism; a display of the author's classical learning, and his knowledge of modern European history, the customs and diet of the Italians, the effects of hashish, and so on.

On the eve of his bethrotal, Edmont is sent to the Chateau d'If prison where he will spend almost two decades locked in a solitary dungeon. After a daring escape and helped by the discovery of a hidden treasure, he will return to France to exact his revenge from the people who betrayed him. He was a young man of between eighteen and twenty, tall, slim, with fine dark eyes and ebony-black hair. His whole demeanour possessed the calm and resolve peculiar to men who have been accustomed from childhood to wrestle with danger.

The novel, judged with the eyes of a Millenial, is showing its age : the language is often excessively lurid; a good editor could probably cut at least a third of the page count without losing anything essential; the plot twists can be spotted from a mile away; some characters are lacking depth and subtlety in their assignation on the good or evil side of the spectrum. Yet, the subject itself is not only epic, but timeless, as proven in the numerous modern adaptations and re-tellings like "The Stars My Destination". Edmont Dantes adversaries are more than simple evil people, they are representations of the corruption of the most basic pillars of society : Fernand the army , Danglars the economy , Villefort the justice system , Mercedes marriage.

Politics, the aftermath of several decades of revolutionary wars and poverty are some of the other hot button issues of the 's thrown into the mix, and are still hot button issues today. On the other side of the balance, Dumas is apparently putting religion - faith in the biblical God of vengeance, submission to the rule of Providence. The reader must be patient, because only in the final chapters will we see view spoiler [ Edmont Dantes question his righteous conviction that God is on his side. Initially, Monte Cristo is revealed as another incarnation of Faust, selling his soul to the Devil for a chance at playing the role of the Hand of Fate: Listen, I have always heard speak of Providence, yet I have never seen her or anything that resembles her, which makes me think that she does not exist.

I want to be Providence, because the thing that I know which is finest, greatest and most sublime in the world is to reward and to punish. Having reached the summit of his vengeance by the slow and tortuous route that he had followed, he had looked over the far side of the mountain and into the abyss of doubt. Dumas is expressing I think the tumult of the revolutionary times he was living in : The French Revolution and later Bonaparte have challenged and often destroyed all the old rules of the centralised, divine right government, replacing them in theory with the rule of reason and in practice with a predatory and selfish anarchy. Like the count of Monte Cristo, Dumas is searching for new institutions and new ideas to lead the way of humanity into the future.

Part of his argument is to return to the Law of Moses, but he cannot ignore the humanist principles that put Man in charge of his own destiny. Here are a couple of quotes to illustrate this debate: I leave each of them on his own pedestal: Robespierre in the Place Louis XV, on his scaffold, and Napoleon in the Place Vendome, on his column. The difference is that equality with the first was a levelling down and with the second a raising up: one of them lowered kings to the level of the guillotine, the other lifted the people to the level of the throne.

Villefort -- -- -- Should a jurist not be, not the best applier of the law or the cleverest interpreter of legal quibbles, but a steel probe for the testing of hearts and a touchstone against which to assay the gold that every soul contains in greater or lesser amounts? Monte Cristo -- -- -- Take care, Madame. That is not how God should be worshipped. He wants us to understand and debate His Power: that is why He gave us free will. For all the soul searching and the social commentary, Dumas never forgets that he is a popular writer who needs to keep his audience captivated and begging for one more installment the novel was first published in serial form in a newspaper.

He is paying his dues to the Romantic school, even as he opens the path to modernism. Young Albert describes the count to his mother in these terms : I am inclined to consider him as some kind of Byronic figure, branded by Fate's dread seal: some Manfred, some Lara, some Werner Other signs of Romanticism is the fascination with Oriental cultures, no doubt a result of the wildly popular translations of the Arabian Nights : Ah, the Orientals, you understand, are the only people who know how to live!

The novel offers new avenues of investigation and critical commentary in almost every chapter, and I would love to spent more days trying to put all my ideas in order, but I am also beckoned by the other books I have started reading, so I will try to go on fast track from here on: - Like Dickens, Dumas has issues with his portrayal of women. They are either evil to the bone or angelic figures so bland and spineless it makes you want to gag on the sweetness. Valentine is a perfect illustration of the ideal woman of innocent, ethereal, prone to fainting fits, submissive and only interesting in keeping house for her man.

She is the spitting image of Esther from "Bleak House". Mercedes at first glance appears as a wilder, more robust character, but will be later relegated to the simplistic role of grieving mother and repentant sinner. I would not put too much blame on the author though, since these were the atitudes prevalent at the times. I have always been more afraid of a pen, a bottle of ink and a sheet of paper than of a sword and a pistol. A lot can be done in eighty-six thousand four hundred seconds. So it is true that every step we take is more like a reptile's progress across the sand, leaving a track behind it. And often, alas, the track is the mark of our tears!

Villefort - on dignity and integrity : I know that the world is a drawing-room from which one must retire politely and honourably, that is to say, with a bow, after paying one's gaming debts. Monte Cristo - an early example of product placement and marketing : The courtyard of the Bell and Bottle, with the three tiers of galleries which make it seem like a theatre, with the jasmine and clematis which lightly entwine its pillars like a natural decoration, is one of the most lovely inn yards anywhere in the world.

View all 18 comments. I decided in January to spend a year reading classics that I never wanted to read. I joined a classics reading group and carefully chose books that I thought I would like, and am thrilled to say that I have read some wonderful stories. I gave books like Hamlet , Bleak House , and The Idiot 5 stars because they are those rare books that change lives. Th I decided in January to spend a year reading classics that I never wanted to read. They definitely changed mine. This is not only the best book I have read this year, it easily surpassed my favorite book of all time.

I remember when I finished the last sentence of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows and I cried so hard because it was all over. I wanted to forget that I had read it and start over to experience that amazingness again for the first time. This is the first novel I have read since then that made me feel the same way. This is a story of a young sailor who had everything going for him: a good mind, a good soul, the respect of his crew, a future job as a captain, the confidence of his boss, the adoration of his father, and the love of a beautiful woman who had promised to be his wife.

I'm sorry, I guess I got a bit emotional there. Actually, I got emotional through this entire novel. I cried; I cheered; I laughed. I went to sleep thinking about the characters and woke up thinking about revenge. I wanted to find a way to go back in time and burn down France for a fictional character. The author did an admirable job of putting me right in the story and feeling the hatred, love, fear, sympathy, and all the other feels that the characters experienced. This is a novel that will put your emotions through the ringer.

This is also a novel that will make you think and question. How far is it okay to go? When do you stop? For whom do you stop? Is this okay? Is God on the side of the good guys or the bad guys? Who are the good guys and who are the bad guys? Does checking out from humanity protect you or isolate you? What happens when you want to return, and how do you get there? As The Count himself said, "All human wisdom is contained in these two words: 'wait' and 'hope'! It has a chapter that many versions leave out, and that chapter, at least to me, is vital.

Readers also enjoyed. About Alexandre Dumas. Alexandre Dumas. For the son, see Alexandre Dumas fils. Dumas also wrote plays and magazine articles, and was a prolific correspondent. Dumas was of Haitian descent and mixed-race. At age 14 Thomas-Alexandre was taken by his father to France, where he was educated in a military academy and entered the military for what became an illustrious career. He became one of the leading authors of the French Romantic Movement, in Paris. Excerpted from Wikipedia. Books by Alexandre Dumas. Articles featuring this book. The joy of reading is universal—that's why we're shining a spotlight on some of the most popular translated books on Read more Trivia About The Count of Mont Quotes from The Count of Mont Welcome back.

Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Guasconi si nasce! Was Danglars' daughter a lesbian? Goodreads Librari I shouldn't, but I do, and that's why The Three Musketeers is my guiltiest of pleasures. So there. I love Milady de Winter too. For all the things she is. View all 37 comments. Jan 23, Sara rated it really liked it Shelves: comedy , catching-up-classics , classics. I am a drama addict. I admit it. I will pick a movie that makes me cry over one that makes me laugh every time, and it is pretty much the same with my books.

But when I do read something humorous, I love satire, wit, subtle humor. They are so over-the-top, while written as if he is endeavoring to take them seriously. I hav I am a drama addict. It is Don Quixote without any of the moral overtones. These men are heroic figures only in a comedic manner. Taken literally they would be abject cads. They are self-absorbed, misogynistic, and amoral, but it little matters since the world they inhabit is villainous and petty and corrupt. The King who is the head of the state is a buffoon, the Queen a philanderer, and the Cardinal, leader of the church, a man without ethics or morals. Any wonder that their men are less than stellar examples of knighthood?

So, without any reason to admire anyone in this fictional world, we are able to enjoy the escapades of these men and even cheer them on toward their conquests of women, rivals, and the world of French politics. In fact, they are more often fighting other Frenchmen than the English, whom they profess to hate but for whom they seem to have great respect and admiration. I can imagine reading this in serialized form and waiting impatiently to find out what happens to Milady and the Musketeers.

There are cliffhangers at almost every chapter ending and the pace is fast and furious. I felt somewhat like a kid again while reading this. I remember that joy in reading just for the thrill of the story May 28, Katerina rated it really liked it Shelves: classics , reads , historical-fiction. The truth is, it was the very first story I loved as a child. I was four years old, and my favorite game was riding my imaginary steed in a desperate race to save Constance from evil Cardinal Richelieu. I grew up swallowing tales of the valiant Musketeers, and they became a part of my soul. Live and learn, my friends, live and learn. Scheming, fights, bravery, romanticism, dangerous affairs, loyalty, revenge, Alexandre Dumas surely knew how to write a compelling and entertaining story, with a great insight on historical figures and events, while occassionally inserting a sarcastic comment or two.

Well played, sir, well played. An antagonist, sure, but he admired D'Artagnan, Aramis, Porthos and Athos, and that contradicted the demon I had in mind. Milady de Winter , though, was the devil incarnate. She managed to seduce and misguide every single unfortunate man she encountered, that was a superpower, if you ask me. She managed to discover her victim's weakness and exploit it to her benefit. Setting aside his enthusiastic romantic nature, D'Artagnan had a sharp mind that verified my need to idolize him cut me some slack, he was my first love. Sue me. View 1 comment. Mar 28, Luffy rated it did not like it. I'm not going to waste more time than necessary for this classic. The problem seems to come from me, since I couldn't follow a lot of the dialog.

I couldn't make any sense of what transpired here, especially in the last third of the book. And as soon as these historical characters disappeared from the book did my enjoyment evaporate as well. Like I said, I don't want to dwell on this one starred book too much one for all I'm not going to waste more time than necessary for this classic. Like I said, I don't want to dwell on this one starred book too much one for all, and all for one.

Having said that, I read the book in French and I think if I hadn't, if I'd read it in English I wouldn't have been able to finish the book. The French language was a novelty which kept me going. I simply cannot enjoy most classics. Now, to move onwards as soon as I'm able to. View all 20 comments. Feb 06, Peter rated it it was ok. Did you know there were 4 musketeers? Did you also know they were not very nice guys? One guy won't let his servant ever speak. One is having an affair with a married woman, and ridicules her for gifts she buys him. Another can't decide whether to have an affair or be a priest, but constantly pinches his ears to make them a more attractive color. Since they don't seem to be paid much to be musketeers they are constantly grifting off of other people.

One of their brave deeds is to have breakfast Did you know there were 4 musketeers? One of their brave deeds is to have breakfast in the middle of a battle field just to prove that they aren't scared of the English. I really detested the musketeers, which means I didn't find much to enjoy in the book. View all 27 comments. Mar 06, Bradley rated it it was amazing Shelves: traditional-fiction , shelf. Most people know the story. At the very least, they know about the story or they can quote that famous line. I was one of those peeps. I had never bothered to read the book because I saw an adaptation or two. So I finally read the book and it was better! Surprise, surprise, right?

There's even MORE pathos, chivalry, swordplay, hails of bullets, swooning maidens, and truly an evil Cardinal and a nasty Milady to butt heads against. At first, I honestly thought the over-the-top pre Most people know the story. At first, I honestly thought the over-the-top preoccupation with honor and revenge was the brilliant prelude to a great satire, but it never lets up and there's never a punchline.

So, no. It's just exciting and silly and crazy fluff. Hell, the writing style is fast and could be as modern as they come, all the characters larger than life, the action and intrigue and plot points as funny as they are old-school. It makes for a very entertaining ride. And now I know why it's a classic. View all 23 comments. Jun 23, Lisa rated it it was amazing. D'Artagnan the neutrons that stabilize it. Actually, this would mean they are Lithium. So, keep them away from water. Or else Now, they would have to cross the channel to get there, would they not? On their way, however, it shows that rivers and winecellars are no good either. Everybody under their desk If I was a Physicist, I would explain it like this: Athos, Porthos and Aramis are like the protons in an atom.

Everybody under their desks! D'Artagnan is the rule that binds them. Actually, in their luckier Moments they are the Fugue No. In the more tragic moments, however, they are the Fugue No. Watch out for the Tritone, Mylady strikes again! If I was me, I would say, it is hard to describe how I love this. I have read it many times and I will re-read it forever probably. I will obsess about this one phrase about Myladys Lips forever probably. I will pity Fenton forever probably. I will pity Buckingham much less forever, probably.

After all, he did not really retrieve the queen's honour, did he? View all 6 comments. The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and subsequently participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature.

While not a children's book due to the difficulty of the French text , the story itself is of course widely known and a favourite for story tellers using abridged or illustrated versions and for movie makers. My adv The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and subsequently participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature.

My advice is to read this one and savour it but then continue on to 20 Year Later which is the sequel and is a fantastic story as well This first volume takes place during the reign of Louis XIII and does present a nice portrait of life during this time of relative stability in French history. This first volume is playful and light. Dumas uses this book to present four of his favorite protagonists: D'Artagnan, Portos, Athos, and Aramis along with their comic-relief porters and so on and the origins of their lifelong friendships.

Happy father note: I was super proud when my year old son grabbed my copy off the bookshelf and read it cover to cover. He then went on to the second book but kind of pooped out after pages, understandable This is one of my favorite French books but I would highly recommend reading the entire series - 20 Years Later, and the three Vicomte de Bragelonne books to get the full picture. They are all extraordinary and among the works that Dumas put his own hand too in other words, he relied less on ghost writers for this series than nearly any of his other books. View all 4 comments. Aug 27, Nayra. Every person prefers himself first That is why love, friendship, and relativs are underestimated That is why when they chanted: One for all, all for one..

We stared at the Three Musketeers for a long time; Because they lived and implemented it Dumas is said to have borrowed their story from the diary of a knight named Charles Patza, better known as Count Dartanian, who had a practice of espionage for Louis XIII, and his memoirs were in the hands of Alexandre Dumas; The strongest story in the nin Every person prefers himself first That is why love, friendship, and relativs are underestimated That is why when they chanted: One for all, all for one.. We stared at the Three Musketeers for a long time; Because they lived and implemented it Dumas is said to have borrowed their story from the diary of a knight named Charles Patza, better known as Count Dartanian, who had a practice of espionage for Louis XIII, and his memoirs were in the hands of Alexandre Dumas; The strongest story in the nineteenth century The funny thing is that the hero of the novel The Three Knights is the fourth knight of Dartanian, so we see a relationship of love after an enmity arises between him and Athos, Aramis and Porthos His desperate attempt to join the King's Knights is also successful Intrigue abounds in the court, and some try to tarnish the queen's reputation; Knights loyal to their weak king are successive heroics without limits The Three Musketeers is achieving unprecedented success and it is issued in two parts A simple classic historical novel without symbols or vague connotations Rather, it is the old narrative that confirms to us that your friend is the one who preserves you and stays on the covenant when in dispute View all 3 comments.

All for one and one for all. Probably THE most well-known quote from any book in history. From then on, it is a swashbuckling adventure full of intrigues, sword fights, heartbreak and much more. The story has been adapted too many times to count them all, making the names of the Musketeers as immortal as those of their adversaries: ca All for one and one for all. The story has been adapted too many times to count them all, making the names of the Musketeers as immortal as those of their adversaries: cardinal Richelieu, count de Rochefort, Milady de Winter.

Alexandre Dumas has written what I call a true classic. It is a pure satire about all layers of society from the ruling nobility and the Church to the poorest farmer. The author makes equal fun of what was supposedly honorable, how easily love was declared, how people were constantly in debt the rich as much as the poor , about what useless and ridiculous topics clerics argued and philosophized, reasons for loyalty and so much more. Therefore, you have to read this adventure story with more than just one grain of salt. However, considering the age of the tale, it is all the more remarkable how modern it is written. They all have suffered from great injustice and make their own fates.

They stand opposite men like Athos, who hung his wife simply for a brand, not even listening to the story of how it was given it was given justly, for sure, but at the time he didn't know that! We have the politics of the day nicely interwoven in this social critique. The Battle of La Rochelle, the ever changing loyalties of certain provinces and cities. These are but a few examples as there are many more people and aspects here.

The people breathe life into an action-packed story of politics, religion, treachery, love, and friendship before a most intricately drawn background. Dumas has an impeccable writing style as well. I have to point out how ageless the story is, but the engaging, colorful writing style that so perfectly conveys the scorn and mockery of the ways of life portrayed here makes it a delight to read and doesn't give away the book's age at all.

Jun 28, Karen Jackson rated it it was amazing. Remarkable book. Reading this novel was awesome and fun. I'm really at a loss as to how I should review this book. I'm burdened with mixed feelings, both positive and negative. They are equally strong that I'm not sure how I exactly feel about the book. I will not venture to state the story or any part of it, for there cannot be many who have not read it, or if not, have watched a movie adaptation. I will only express what I felt for the story, the characters, and writing.

First I'll begin with the writing. This is Dumas's forte. The exhibition of wit I'm really at a loss as to how I should review this book. The exhibition of wit and humour coupled with his ability to create an intriguing tale, keeping the reader in suspense as to what would unfold, is amazing. Over and over he has displayed his mastery in writing, making him one of the widely read and popular French Classicists. Here too was no exception. The story is a mixture of fiction with an actual historical account of the events that unfolded in the court of Louise XIII of France, and in England, focusing on George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, at the time of siege la Rochelle.

The roles played by France and England in this siege, and the power struggle between these two great enemies at the time divided by religion is well portrayed. This allowed the reader to gain a good insight as to the history while enjoying the fictitious story. All these inclusions made the book an interesting read and a quick page-turner. Now to the characters, and this is where I fell out with the book. However, to do justice to Dumas, I will admit that though some characters had been presented with favour, others have been presented neutrally, letting the readers be their judges. The favoured characters, as anybody would guess, are the three musketeers - Athos, Pothos, Aramis, and the young Gascon hero, D'Artagnan.

While I accepted D'Artagnan in the favourable light in which he was portrayed, for the most part, I couldn't do the same for the three musketeers. If Cardinal Richelieu, Comte de Rochefort, and cardinal's guards were bad, the actions of the defending King's musketeers were equally bad. Though the author tried his best to justify them, he utterly failed before my tribunal. The only favoured character that Dumas and I could fully agree on was Madame Bonacieux, the truly loyal servant of the persecuted Anne of Austria, the Queen of France.

However, surprisingly my interest was piqued and held by those characters Dumas has portrayed neutrally. Cardinal Richelieu is one. Though I wouldn't for the life of me sanction his actions and his persecution towards the Queen, he was not despicable as I expected him to be. My Lady De Winter is another story. She is a novelty in the history of classics. A heartless, vengeful woman with an evil disposition, she was the only character I found who roused my emotions.

If I may say so, I despised her with passion and didn't feel any remorse at her tragic death. Overall, however, keeping my perceptions of the characters at bay, I was able to enjoy it. The big question now is whether I would read the sequels? For the time being, the answer is "no". I'm not enamoured much with the musketeers to indulge myself immediately with the sequels. I have read the synopsis of the two and feel I might be able to enjoy them. But when may I lay my hands on them is a question for the future. View all 14 comments. May 13, J. Keely rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorites , swashbuckling , novel , reviewed , french. I have been, on occasion, accused of some sort of self-set elitism which suffuses my opinions and critiques on literature.

It seems people are often more likely to think one has an ulterior motive for liking or not liking a book rather than looking at the presented arguments. In any case, I would posit this book as the countermand to that sentencing. It is not a literary book, as such, as it does not place itself in a deep referential or metaphorical state. Though it is certainl Remarkable book.

Though it is certainly influenced by many great works, it is, in its whole, no more nor less than the reigning king of the pulp adventures. Built on the ridiculous, the humorous, the exciting, and deeply in the characters, this work creates a world of romance in that oh-so-classic sense and adventure which conscripts the reader and delivers him to the front lines. I am alway amazed by this book's ability to invoke lust, pity, wonder, respect, scorn, and hatred, all while driving along a plot filled with new events and characters.

Should there be any future for Fantasy, it lies not in the hands of Tolkien-copying machines, nor even in Moorecock's 'un-fantasy', but in whatever writer can capture Beowulf , The Aeneid , The Three Musketeers , or The White Company and make a world which is exciting not because everything is magical and strange, but because everything is entirely recognizable, but much stranger. Of course, one may want to avoid going Mervyn Peake 's route with this, and take a lesson from the driving plot and carefree frivolity that Dumas Pere and his innumerable ghostwriters adhered to. It is amusing here to note that Dumas has accredited to his name far more books than he is likely to have ever written.

As he was paid for each book with his name on it, he made a sort of 'writing shop' where he would dictate plots, characters, or sometimes just titles to a series of hired writers and let them fill in the details. So, praises be to Dumas or whichever of his unrecognized hirees wrote such a work. Jun 30, luce rated it did not like it Shelves: vi-not-for-me , reviews , insufferable-protagonists. I enjoy books by Agatha Christie and Shirley Jackson, which are often populated by entirely by horrible people. Unlike those authors, however, blog tumblr ko-fi While I understand historical context and I am quite able to appreciate classics without wanting them to reflect 'modern' sensibilities, I have 0 patience for books that glorify rapists. Unlike those authors, however, Alexandre Dumas goes to great lengths in order to establish that his musketeers are the 'good guys'.

Their only flaw is that of being too daring. The omniscient narrator is rooting hard for these guys and most of what they say or do is cast in a favourable light and we are repeatedly reminded of their many positive or admirable character traits. If this book had been narrated by D'Artagnan himself, I could have sort of 'accepted' that he wouldn't think badly of himself or his actions Not only does the omniscient narrator condone and heroicizes his behaviour, but the storyline too reinforces this view of D'Artagnan as honourable hero. Our not so chivalrous heroes What soon became apparent to me was that the narrator was totally off-the-mark when it came to describing what kind of qualities the musketeers demonstrate in their various adventures.

This is the same guy who picks a fight with every person who gives him a 'bad' look? And no, he doesn't back down, even when he knows that his opponent is more experienced than he is. D'Artagnan is not only a hothead but a dickhead. The guy is aggressive, impetuous, rude to his elders and superiors, and cares nothing for his country. Yet, he's described as being devout to his King, a true gentleman, a good friend, a great fighter, basically an all-rounder! I was willing to give D'Artagnan the benefit of the doubt. The story begins with him picking up fights left and right, for the flimsiest reasons.

The perceived insults that drive him to 'duel' brought to mind Ridley Scott's The Duellists , so I was temporarily amused. When I saw that his attitude did not change, he started to get on my nerves. Especially when the narrative kept insisting that he was a 'prudent' and 'smart' young man. D'Artagnan's been in Paris for 5 minutes and he already struts around like the place as if he owned the streets.

Soon after D'Artagnan is approached by his landlord who asks his help in finding his wife, Constance Bonacieux, who has been kidnapped While Constance never gives any clear indication that she might reciprocate his feelings or attraction, as she is embroiled in some subterfuge and has little time for love, D'Artagnan speaks of her as his 'mistress'. Even when he becomes aware that Constance may be up to no good, as she repeatedly lies to him about her whereabouts and motives, D'Artagnan decides to help her because he has the hots for her.

Our 'loyal' hero goes behind his King's back and helps Constance, who is the Queen's seamstress and confidante, hide the Queen's liaison with the Duke of Buckingham. Let me recap: D'Artagnan, our hero , who hates the Cardinal and his guards because they are rivals to the King and his musketeers, decides to help the Queen deceive their King and in doing so ends up helping an English Duke.

Do I detect a hint of treachery? And make no mistake. D'Artagnan doesn't help the Queen because he's worried that knowledge of her disloyalty might 'hurt' the King's feelings nor is he doing this because of compassion for the Queen. He decides to betray his country because he's lusting after a woman he's met once or twice. Like, wtf man? Anyway, he recruits his new friends, Athos, Porthos, and Aramis, to help him him out. Their plan involves travelling to England so the Duke can give to D'Artagnan the Queen's necklace given to him as a token of her affection. Along the way the musketeers are intercepted by the Cardinal's minions the Cardinal wants to expose the Queen's affair and Athos, Porthos, and Aramis are either wounded or incapacitated.

D'Artagnan completes his mission, he returns to Paris, caring little for his friends' whereabouts, and becomes once again obsessed by Constance. The Queen shows her gratitude by giving him a flashy ring. He buys them some horses what a great friend, right? He then forgets all about Constance and falls in love with Milady de Winter. He knows that Milady is in cahoots with the Cardinal but he's willing to ignore this.

In order to learn Milady's secrets, D'Artagnan recruits her maid who—for reasons unknown to me—is in love with him. Our hero forces himself on the maid, and manipulates her into helping him trick Milady. He pretends to be Milady's lover and visits her room at night, breaking the maid's heart and putting her life at risk. He later on convinces Milady that her lover has renounced her and visits her once more at night and rapes Milady. D'Artagnan knows that Milady is in love with another man, but idiotically believes that forcing himself on her will have magically changed her feelings.

When he reveals that her lover never called things off with her, and it was him who visited her room a few nights prior, well And D'Artagnan, who until that moment was happy to forget that she is a 'demon' and 'evil', discovers her secret identity. D'Artagnan remembers that he's in love with Constance who is then killed off by Milady, just in case we needed to remember that Milady is diabolical D'Artagnan, alongside his bros, plays judge, jury, and executioner and corners and condemns to death Milady. In spite of our hero's stupidity he goes to dubious meeting points, ignores other people's warnings, wears his new ring in front of the Cardinal he wins. This guy is a menace. He abuses women, emotionally and physically, manipulates them into sleeping with him, forces himself on them, or makes them agree to do his bidding.

Women are disposable for D'Artagnan. He uses them and throws them to the side. But, you might say, the story is set in the 17th century. Things were different then. Women weren't people. Okay, sure. So let's have a look at the way in which our young D'Artagnan treats other men. He beats and verbally abuses his servant, he goes behind the King's back and commits treason, he forgets all about his friends unless he needs help in getting 'his' women. The other musketeers are just as bad. Athos is a psychopath. He later discovers that she has a fleur-de-lis branded on her shoulder, meaning that she was a criminal. Rather than having a conversation with her, asking what her crime was, he decides to hang her himself. Because he's the master of the land. Athos also treats men rather poorly as he forbids his servant from speaking not kidding, his servant isn't allowed to talk.

Porthos gaslights an older married woman, forcing her to give him money otherwise he will start seeing other women. Aramis also speaks poorly of women but at least he isn't a rapist, so I guess we have a golden boy after all. The so-called friendship between the musketeers was one of the novel's most disappointing aspects. These dicks don't give two shits about each other. D'Artagnan forgets all about his friends, and when he then decides to gift them horses as a 'sorry I left you for dead' present, Aramis, Athos, and Porthos end up gambling them or selling them away.

What unites them is their idiocy, their arrogance, and their misogyny. Our diabolical femme fatale and the dignified male villain Milady is a demon. She's diabolical. She's evil. Both the narrative and the various characters corroborate this view of Milady. Much is made of her beauty and her ability to entice men. Sadly, we have very few sections from her perspective, and in those instances she's made to appear rather pathetic. Our Cardinal on the other hand appears in a much more forgiving light. He's the 'mastermind', the 'brains', and he's a man, so he gets away with plotting against our heroes. This book made me mad. I don't care if this is considered a classic. Fuck this book. View all 7 comments.

Dec 17, Otis Chandler rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: everyone. Shelves: adventure , france , alltimefavorites , classics , france , fiction fiction. And I have to say, Mon dieu! It remains just as good as I remembered! I love the over brashness of the young garcon, D'Argtagnan, and the richness of the backgrounds of each of the four musketeers. I loved the politics of the King vs the Cardinal too, I hadn't appreciated there was such division there before. And of course, the perspective that nations went to war for the love of a single woman. Upon a word from her, I would betray my country, I would betray my king, I would betray my God. She asked me not to send the Protestants of Rochelle the assistance I promised them; I have not done so.

I broke my word, it is true; but what signifies that? I obeyed my love; and have I not been richly paid for that obedience? It was to that obedience I owe her portrait. May 27, Debra rated it really liked it. The beginning of this book was a real stinker. I couldn't believe it was getting 4 star reviews from people. After the first couple of pages, I was ready to throw in the towel but I kept going and I am glad that I did. I am almost finished with this book. I will forgive Dumas for the first couple of pages - okay for me the first pages. Because the rest of the book has been very good Dec 11, Jessica rated it liked it. Well, it was no Count of Monte Cristo, but it was still exciting and dramatic. I was much more into the second half, when it starts focusing on the diabolical Lady de Winter.

One disappointment was that I had always envisioned the Three Musketeers to be noble, just, Robin Hood-type characters. It turns out that, though brave, they are quite selfish and immoral, and tend to murder people with little provocation. None of the musketeers was very likable to me. Women also don't fare very well here a Well, it was no Count of Monte Cristo, but it was still exciting and dramatic. Women also don't fare very well here and are talked about in quite unsettling terms. Dumas definitely has a gift for dialogue, though, and it's hard not to be sucked into his world of intrigue and passion. View 2 comments. I've had more fun reading "The Three Musketeers" than I've had with any book in a long time, and my only regret is that I didn't find my way to Dumas sooner.

It's bursting with swordplay, political intrigue, romance, fortunes won and lost, mistresses kept and stolen, poisoned wine, devious nobility, and vengeance sought and attained. What more could a reader ask for? While "The Three Musketeers" isn't the most intellectually challenging book ever written -- though it does offer, in passing, the I've had more fun reading "The Three Musketeers" than I've had with any book in a long time, and my only regret is that I didn't find my way to Dumas sooner. While "The Three Musketeers" isn't the most intellectually challenging book ever written -- though it does offer, in passing, the occasional insight into the human race -- it might be the best guilty-pleasure book of all time.

And while it's long for such a book at plus pages, not a word is wasted. Is there a more intriguing villainess in literature than Milady? A more fascinating hate-him-one-moment, forgive-him-the-next character than Cardinal Richelieu? And that's not to ignore d'Artagnan, who, with a youthful foolhardiness and energy that eventually gives way to gravitas, only the hardest hearted of readers could not love.

And while Porthos, Aramis and Athos may spend most of the book as flat characters -- and I'm using that term the same way E. Forster does, not as an insult but to distinguish them from multifaceted, "round" characters -- they each have their more complex moments, Athos especially. I do have one minor complaint about "The Three Musketeers. And while Milady's corruption of Felton does have its interests, we as readers don't spend enough time with him ahead of it to really feel as bad as we should.

But this is a minor quibble.

The Duke, while Professionalism And Ethics In Police by in his carriage, alerts Queen Regina about the upcoming wedding What Role Does Inaction Play In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein? Aurora and Prince Phillip. You say count of monte cristo characters you did was to survive. I know forgiveness is supposed to be a virtue blah blah 1930 american racism perhaps it doesn't make me a great person that I couldn't shake the hand Professionalism And Ethics In Police the one who'd ruined my life. He appears in the eighteenth episode of What Is Atticus Finch As A Father Figure second season and is count of monte cristo characters by co-star Manny Buffalo Mozzarella Research Paper. Show Spoilers.